Quantum transitions and dressed unstable states

G. Ordonez, T. Petrosky, and I. Prigogine
Phys. Rev. A 63, 052106 – Published 17 April 2001
PDFExport Citation

Abstract

We consider the problem of the meaning of quantum unstable states including their dressing. According to both Dirac and Heitler this problem has not been solved in the usual formulation of quantum mechanics. A precise definition of excited states is still needed to describe quantum transitions. We use our formulation given in terms of density matrices outside the Hilbert space. We obtain a dressed unstable state for the Friedrichs model, which is the simplest model that incorporates both bare and dressed quantum states. The excited unstable state is derived from the stable states through analytic continuation. It is given by an irreducible density matrix with broken time symmetry. It can be expressed by a superposition of Gamow density operators. The main difference from previous studies is that excited states are not factorizable into wave functions. The dressed unstable state satisfies all the criteria that we can expect: it has a real average energy and a nonvanishing trace. The average energy differs from Green’s function energy by a small effect starting with fourth order in the coupling constant. Our state decays following a Markovian equation. There are no deviations from exponential decay neither for short nor for long times, as is the case for the bare state. The dressed state satisfies an uncertainty relation between energy and lifetime. We can also define dressed photon states and describe how the energy of the excited state is transmitted to the photons. There is another very important aspect: deviations from exponential decay would be in contradiction with indiscernibility as one could define, e.g., old mesons and young mesons according to their lifetime. This problem is solved by showing that quantum transitions are the result of two processes: a dressing process, discussed in a previous publication, and a decay process, which is much slower for electrodynamic systems. During the dressing process the unstable state is prepared. Then the dressed state decays in a purely exponential way. In the Hilbert space the two processes are not separated. Therefore it is not astonishing that we obtain for the unstable dressed state an irreducible density matrix outside the Liouville-Hilbert-space. This is a limit of Hilbert space states that are arbitrarily close to the decaying state. There are experiments that could verify our proposal. A typical one would be the study of the line shape, which is due to the superposition of the short-time process and the long-time process. The long-time process taken separately leads to a much sharper line shape, and avoids the divergence of the fluctuation predicted by the Lorentz line shape.

  • Received 20 October 2000

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.63.052106

©2001 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

G. Ordonez, T. Petrosky, and I. Prigogine

  • Center for Studies in Statistical Mechanics and Complex Systems, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712
  • International Solvay Institutes for Physics and Chemistry, CP231, 1050 Brussels, Belgium

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 63, Iss. 5 — May 2001

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×