Nitrogen at the Si-nanocrystal/SiO2 interface and its influence on luminescence and interface defects

Daniel Hiller, Silvana Goetze, Frans Munnik, Mihaela Jivanescu, Jürgen W. Gerlach, Jürgen Vogt, Eckhard Pippel, Nikolai Zakharov, Andre Stesmans, and Margit Zacharias
Phys. Rev. B 82, 195401 – Published 1 November 2010

Abstract

The influence of the high-temperature annealing ambient, i.e., N2 and Ar on size controlled Si nanocrystals (NCs) ranging from 2 to 6nm embedded in SiO2 has been investigated in detail. Generally, N2 annealing is proven to be beneficial as the dangling bond density (Pb defects at the NC/SiO2 interface) is about half, accompanied by a doubled photoluminescence (PL) intensity. The PL blueshift of N2 annealed samples compared to Ar-annealed samples (N-blueshift) was found to be pronounced only for small NCs whereas it appears to be insignificant for larger NCs. The origin of this N-blueshift was previously attributed to a growth suppression of the NCs by the presence of N during the annealing process. However, no evidence for this assumption is found by time-resolved PL, as the luminescence decay times are similar despite considerable N-blueshift. The exact location of the N incorporated during annealing was investigated by time-of-flight-SIMS and electron-spin resonance. Besides the distinct N enrichment in the NC layer, the K0 center (SiN3) was detected indicating the formation of an interfacial N layer at the NC/SiO2 interface. Elastic recoil detection analysis enabled the quantification of the incorporated N as well as the excess Si. Combined with transmission electron microscopy analysis (determination of NC size) the calculation of the NC density per superlattice layer and the thickness of the interfacial N layer were achieved. It turns out that 5×1014Natomscm2 exist at the NC surface, which is well in accordance to the optimum value of the bulk Si/SiO2 interface. These results strongly support our recently suggested explanation for the N-blueshift that is based on an increased NC band gap by the influence of interfacial N on the polarity of the surface terminating groups.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
2 More
  • Received 27 May 2010

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.195401

©2010 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Daniel Hiller1, Silvana Goetze2, Frans Munnik3, Mihaela Jivanescu4, Jürgen W. Gerlach5, Jürgen Vogt6, Eckhard Pippel2, Nikolai Zakharov2, Andre Stesmans4, and Margit Zacharias1

  • 1IMTEK, Faculty of Engineering, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Georges-Köhler-Allee 103, 79110 Freiburg, Germany
  • 2Max Planck Institute of Microstructure Physics, Weinberg 2, 06120 Halle, Germany
  • 3Forschungszentrum Dresden-Rossendorf e.V., Bautzner Landstrasse 400, 01328 Dresden, Germany
  • 4Department of Physics, University of Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200D, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
  • 5Leibniz Institute of Surface Modification (IOM), Permoserstrasse 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany
  • 6Faculty of Physics and Earth Sciences, University of Leipzig, Linnéstrasse 5, 04103 Leipzig, Germany

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 82, Iss. 19 — 15 November 2010

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×