Dirac-Brueckner-Hartree-Fock versus chiral effective field theory

Francesca Sammarruca, B. Chen, L. Coraggio, N. Itaco, and R. Machleidt
Phys. Rev. C 86, 054317 – Published 26 November 2012

Abstract

We compare nuclear and neutron matter predictions based on two different ab initio approaches to nuclear forces and the nuclear many-body problem. The first consists of a realistic meson-theoretic nucleon-nucleon potential together with the relativistic counterpart of the Brueckner-Hartree-Fock theory of nuclear matter. The second is based on chiral effective field theory, with density-dependent interactions derived from leading-order chiral three-nucleon forces. We find the results to be very close and conclude that both approaches contain important features governing the physics of nuclear and neutron matter.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 25 September 2012

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.86.054317

©2012 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Francesca Sammarruca1, B. Chen1, L. Coraggio2, N. Itaco3,2, and R. Machleidt1

  • 1Physics Department, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844-0903, USA
  • 2Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Complesso Universitario di Monte S. Angelo, Via Cintia, I-80126 Napoli, Italy
  • 3Departimento di Scienze Fisiche, Universitá di Napoli Federico II, Complesso Universitario di Monte S. Angelo, Via Cintia, I-80126 Napoli, Italy

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 86, Iss. 5 — November 2012

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×