Dietary Blueberry and Bifidobacteria Attenuate Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Rats by Affecting SIRT1-Mediated Signaling Pathway

Ren, Tingting; Huang, Chao; Cheng, Mingliang

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/469059

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 | Article ID 469059 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/469059

Dietary Blueberry and Bifidobacteria Attenuate Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Rats by Affecting SIRT1-Mediated Signaling Pathway

Tingting Ren,¹Chao Huang,²and Mingliang Cheng³

Academic Editor: Cinzia Signorini

Received22 Aug 2014

Revised01 Nov 2014

Accepted03 Nov 2014

Published27 Nov 2014

Abstract

NAFLD model rats were established and divided into NAFLD model (MG group), SIRT1 RNAi (SI group), blueberry juice (BJ group), blueberry juice + bifidobacteria (BJB group), blueberry juice + SIRT1 RNAi (BJSI group), and blueberry juice + bifidobacteria + SIRT1 RNAi groups (BJBSI group). A group with normal rats was a control group (CG). BJB group ameliorated NAFLD, which was better than BJ group (). The lipid accumulation was lower in CG, BJ, and BJB groups than that in MG, SI, BJSI, and BJBSI groups (). The levels of SIRT1 and PPAR-α were higher in CG, BJ, and BJB groups than those in MG, SI, BJSI, and BJBSI groups (). The levels of SREBP-1c were lower in CG, BJ, and BJB groups than those in MG, SI, BJSI, and BJBSI groups (). The biochemical indexes SOD, GSH, and HDL-c were improved from CG to BJB group (). Inversely, the levels of AST and ALT, TG, TC, LDL-c, and MDA were decreased from CG to BJB group (). These changes enhance antioxidative capability and biochemical index of rats. Blueberry juice and bifidobacteria improve NAFLD by activating SIRTI-mediating signaling pathway.

1. Introduction

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a progressive pathological change in chronic liver diseases and ranges from 9 to 36.9% of the population in different places of the world [1]. NAFLD is often associated with hepatocellular damage, which can be evaluated by the levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) [2]. AST is a potential biomarker for the diagnosis of early onset of NAFLD [3]. The ratio of AST-to-platelet has also been used for the diagnosis of NAFLD patients [4]. NAFLD is closely related with risk factors such as increased concentrations of plasma triglyceride (TG) and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-c) [5, 6]. The ratio of TG to high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-c) is regarded as a useful biomarker for the diagnosis of atherogenic lipid abnormalities. TG/HDL-c ratio can also be used to identify NAFLD patients with metabolic derangement [7].

Oxidative stress is one of the main causes of NAFLD, which is further exacerbated with steatohepatitis [8]. Malondialdehyde (MDA) and reduced glutathione (GSH) are biomarkers of oxidative stress [9, 10]. Under oxidative stress, intracellular superoxide species are often produced and associated with hepatic injury, and thus the injury can be prevented by the elimination of intracellular superoxide species [11]. Hepatic antioxidant enzyme, superoxide dismutase (SOD), plays a critical role in eliminating the superoxide species and is often highly expressed in hepatic injury [11]. Plasma high-density lipoprotein (HDL) is another antioxidant protein and involved in antiatherogenic effects. Plasma HDL can reduce the level of nonesterified fatty acid hydroperoxides and participates in the antioxidant property of HDL [12].

Although hepatocytes hold promising mechanisms for treating NAFLD, the medicine therapy seems necessary for the treatment of NAFLD, such as metformin, rosuvastatin, and pioglitazone [13, 14]. However, most of the medicine has unwanted adverse effects [15, 16] and limits its usage. Therefore, it is critical to find an affective therapeutic way with fewer side effects [16]. Nonpharmaceutical therapy has become a new trend for the therapy of NAFLD [17]. Blueberry (Vaccinium ashei), a kind of small fruits, may meet such a demand and has pronounced health effects on NAFLD due to being rich in antioxidants [18, 19]. Our previous results show that dietary supplementation of blueberry can enhance antioxidative capability of the liver via increasing MT expression and SOD activity, resulting in promoting HSC inactivation and thus decreasing matrix collagen accumulation in hepatic cells and therefore ameliorating hepatic fibrosis [20]. However, the mechanisms of blueberry juice for improving the hepatic injury are still widely unknown, and the therapeutic effects are still needed to be improved. Some work reported that bifidobacteria possess strong antioxidant activity [21, 22]. Blueberry and bifidobacteria also show higher protective effects on hepatocytes injury. They reduce the liver injury and improve the barrier functions and antioxidant activity [23].

To understand the molecular mechanisms of the action of blueberry and bifidobacteria, Sirtuins type 1 (SIRT1), an important histone deacetylase, is a potential molecule and main determinant of whole body homeostasis in mammals by regulating many transcriptional regulators in metabolic tissues such as liver and adipose tissues [24]. Sterol regulatory element binding protein (SREBP)-1c is a transcription factor for controlling the expression of genes related to fatty acid and triglyceride synthesis. SIRT1 controls the expression and function of SREBP-1c and decreases hepatic lipogenesis via inhibiting the bioactivity of SREBP-1c [25]. Furthermore, SIRT1 regulates lipid homeostasis by upregulating peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor alpha (PPAR-)α, a nuclear receptor mediating adaptive response such as fasting and starvation [26]. PPAR-α activation can enhance the protein level of antioxidant enzymes, such as SOD [27]. Blueberry and bifidobacteria may ameliorate the liver disease via SIRT1 signaling pathway and have not been explored yet. Here, we want to explore the possible mechanism for protective effects of blueberry and bifidobacteria diet on NAFLD via SIRT1-mediated pathway.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Blueberry juice was prepared from Guizhou Academy of Sciences (Guizhou, China). The blueberry was stored at −20°C until experimental use. Fresh blueberry juice was prepared using homogenization. Mixed cultures of bifidobacteria (Bifidobacterium animalis, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium infantis, and Bifidobacterium longum) were used according to a previous report [29]. All the bacteria were purchased from China General Microorganisms Culture Collection Center, Institute of Microbiology (Beijing, China).

2.2. High-Fat Diet- (HFD-) Induced Rat Model of NAFLD

The study was designed as Figure 1 showed. Fifty-eight male Sprague-Dawley rats (200 to 250 g) were purchased from the Animal Center of Guiyang Medical College (Approval Number SCXK (Guizhou) 2002-0001, Guiyang, China). After the acclimatization, 50 rats were randomly selected and fed with a HFD for 8 weeks. The high-fat diet was prepared according to a previous report [30]. The control diet was composed of 4.3 percent fat (10 percent of the metabolizable energy), and the high-fat diet was composed of 35 percent fat (31.6 percent saturated fat and 3.2 percent unsaturated fat, 57 percent of the metabolizable energy). The established rat model was evaluated in two rats using histopathological method and the 48 remaining rats were randomly divided into six groups (8 animals/group) as Figure 1 showed. The remaining 8 normal rats were assigned as a control group (CG group) (Figure 1).

Figure 1

The flowchart of study. HFD: high-fat diet; NAFLD: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; CG: a group with normal rats was assigned as a control group; MG: NAFLD model group; SI: SIRT1 RNAi group; BJ: blueberry juice group; BJSI: blueberry juice + SIRT1 RNAi group; BJB: blueberry juice + bifidobacteria group; BJBSI: blueberry juice + bifidobacteria + SIRT1 RNAi group; SOD: superoxide dismutase; GSH: reduced glutathione; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; TG: total triglyceride; TC: total cholesterol; HDL-c: high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL-c: low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; MDA: malondialdehyde.

2.3. Experimental Design

The pshRNA-H1-Luc lentivector was purchased from System Biosciences (Mountain View, USA). The siRNA sequence targeting SIRT1, 5′-CAGGTTGCAGGAATCCAAAG-3′ was synthesized (Takala (Dalian) Co. Ltd., Dalian, China) and cloned into the pshRNA-H1-Luc lentivector, namely, pshRNA-H1-Luc-SIRT1-siRNA. The reconstructed vectors were cotransfected into 293T producer cells using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Shanghai, China) and pPACK Packaging Plasmid Mix (System Biosciences, Mountain View, USA). Viral supernatants were collected after 48 h transfection. The titers were measured using serial dilutions of lentivirus. Twenty-four model rats with NAFLD were intra-articularly injected with 0.1 mL culture medium containing the LV-mediated SIRT1 siRNA. As Figure 1 showed, normal rats (without NAFLD) were assigned as a control group (CG group) and NAFLD model rats were divided into model group (MG group), blueberry juice group (BJ group), SIRT1 RNAi group (SI group), blueberry juice + bifidobacteria group (BJB group), blueberry juice group + SIRT1 RNAi group (BJSI group), and blueberry juice + bifidobacteria + SIRT1 RNAi group (BJBSI group). Rats in CG, MG, and SI groups were fed with a normal diet and water. Blueberry juice (15 g/kg, once a day) or blueberry juice + bifidobacteria (each rat received 3 mL (10⁸ colony forming units [CFU]/mL) of the bifidobacteria, once a day) [23] were given to the rats in corresponding groups. After eight weeks, rats were killed for collecting blood and livers. Each liver was fixed in 10% neutral formalin. The remains of liver were stored at −80°C. Rat serum was prepared using centrifugation at 1500 rpm for 15 min and also stored at −80°C. All the procedures for animal studies were consistent with the Animal Care and Use Guidance of Guiyang Medical College (Guiyang, China).

2.4. Hepatic Lipid Accumulation Assay

A total 10 mg of each liver sample in 2 mL PBS was gently passed through a 16-gauge blunt-end needle (Catalog Number 28110, Beijing Biocoen Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) for three times. A single cell suspension was made via filtration through a 100 μm cell strainer. Hepatic lipid accumulation assay was performed using Hepatic Lipid Accumulation Kit (Catalog Number ab133131), which was purchased from Abcam Trading (Shanghai) Company Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Briefly, hepatocytes were prepared at a density of 10⁴ cells/well in a 96-well plate and stained with Oil Red O and examined by measuring the absorbance at 490 nm.

2.5. Histopathology Analysis

Liver samples were embedded in paraffin after 24 h fixation in 10% formalin. Subsequently, samples were cut into 5 mm pieces and placed on the slides. All samples were then stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Oil Red O to evaluate the results of NAFLD [31–33]. After deparaffinization and subsequent rehydration and antigen unmasking, liver sections were treated with 3% H₂O₂ for 10 min. They were then incubated with anti-SIRT1 (ab104833, Abcam, Cambridge, USA), anti-SREBP-1c (ab3259, Abcam), and anti-PPAR-α (ab8934, Abcam) antibody (1 : 100) overnight at 4°C. Samples were then processed using an EnVision kit (Production Number 10N1775A, Dako company, Dako, Denmark) while PBS was used as a negative control. The cells were considered to be positive when cytoplasm/nucleus was stained with brown staining. All the images were analyzed by the Biomias 2000 Image Instrument.

2.6. Real-Time Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted from liver tissues using RNA Extraction kit ver4.0 (TaKaRa Biotechnology (Dalian) Co., Ltd., Dalian, China). The RNA was reversely transcripted into cDNA using M-MuLV reverse transcriptase + oligo (dT) primers. The SYBR Green DNA PCR kit (Production Number 0804104, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA) was used for real-time RT-PCR analysis. PCR primers are as follows: SIRT1, F: 5′AGGGAACCTCTGCCTCATCTAC3′, R: 5′GGCATACTCGCCACCTAACC3′; SREBP-1c, F: 5′CGCTACCGTTCCTCTATCAATG3′, R: 5′CGTTTCTACCACTTCAGGTTTCA3′; PPAR-α, F: 5′ATTTGCCAAGGCTATCCCA3′, R: 5′CAGCATCCCGTCTTTGTTCA3′; and GAPDH, F: 5′GGAAAGCTGTGGCGTGAT3′, R: 5′AAGGTGGAAGAATGGGAGTT3′; the values of cycle time for the interest genes were normalized with GAPDH. The mRNA levels were showed as relative increases comparing with the control set as 100%.

2.7. Western Blot Analysis

Western blot was performed as previously reported [34]. Briefly, the livers were isolated from rats under aseptic conditions. The liver lysate of samples was electrophoresed into SDS-PAGE and transferred electrophoretically to a Polyvinylidene Difluoride (PVDF) (Beijing Starget Chemicals Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). The membrane was incubated with anti-SIRT1 (ab104833, Abcam, Cambridge, USA), anti-SREBP-1c (ab3259, Abcam), and anti-PPAR-α (ab8934, Abcam) antibody (1 : 100) overnight at 4°C. Subsequently, all the samples were incubated with peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-rat IgG (1 : 2000, Shanghai Sangon Biological Engineering Technology & Services Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China). The immunoreactive band was visualized with DAB (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Rockford, IL, USA).

2.8. Analysis of Biochemical Parameters of Enzyme Activities

NAFLD is associated with increased oxidative stress in mammals [35]. The levels of SOD, AST, ALT, and GSH have been reported as the biomarkers of oxidative stress [36–41]. Therefore, the levels of all these molecules were measured in blood samples. The serum activities of AST and ALT were determined using another biochemical analysis instrument (Siemens Advia 1650, Bensheim, Germany). Liver samples were homogenated using liquid nitrogen. The activity of SOD was measured according to a previous report [42]. A fluorometric method was used to determine the levels of GSH [43].

2.9. Analysis of Biochemical Parameters of Lipid Metabolism

The hallmark of NAFLD is hepatic lipid accumulation, which is closely related with the metabolism of TG, TC, HDL-c, and LDL-c [44, 45]. The blood samples were used for the measurement of TG, TC, HDL-c, and LDL-c levels, according to the commercial instructions for the biochemical analyzer (Beijing Jinji Aomeng Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Malondialdehyde (MDA), one kind of the biomarkers of oxidative damage, was measured according to a previous report [46].

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was carried out using SPSS 20 package (Chicago, IL, USA). Before statistical analysis, histograms and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov methods were performed; this determined a normal distribution of the variables. Quantitative data with normal distribution were expressed as and subjected to one-way analysis of variance, followed by Tukey’s Post Test for multiple comparisons. Ordinal data were analyzed by Radit analysis. was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Blueberry Juice and Bifidobacteria Consumption Attenuates NAFLD

We established a rat model with NAFLD and the degree of NAFLD was assessed by H&E (marked as “H”) and Oil Red O (marked as “O”) staining (Figure 2). In CG group, hepatocytes were found with a common radial array encircling the central veins, and no large lipid droplets were observed. In NAFLD MG group, the lobular structures of hepatocytes were disrupted, and the hepatic plates were diffused with many lipid droplets. In SI group, the lobular structures of hepatocytes were significantly disrupted, and the hepatic plates were diffused with more lipid droplets. These histopathological varieties showed that a NAFLD rat model was established successfully. The degrees of NAFLD were significantly alleviated and degenerated hepatocyte fat was reduced in BJ group and BJB groups compared with those in MG, SI, BJSI, and BJBSI groups (Figure 2). In SI group, the structure of hepatic cords was destroyed and many lipid droplets appeared when the gene SIRT1 was silenced, which was similar with that in MG group. In BJ group, the hepatic cords could be observed and orderly arranged around a central vein. A few small-size lipid droplets could be observed. In BJSI group, the structure of hepatic cords was destroyed and many lipid droplets appeared when the gene SIRT1 was silenced. In BJB group, the hepatic cords were clearly observed and neatly arranged around a central vein and a few lipid droplets appeared. In BJBSI group, the structure of hepatic cords was destroyed. Some small- and middle-large lipid droplets appeared. Hepatic lipid accumulation assay showed the similar changing trend for degrees of fat accumulation from CG to BJBSI groups. The results showed that blueberry juice and bifidobacteria consumption can improve the symptoms of NAFLD significantly compared with the group only fed with blueberry juice.

Figure 2

Effect of blueberry juice and bifidobacteria on NAFLD and liver damage. NAFLD rat model was induced with high-fat diet according to a previous report [28]. The nutritional contents of diets were consistent with the previous report [28]. Subsequently, some rats were feeding with or without daily blueberry juice (or blueberry and bifidobacteria) gavage. Half of the rats fed with blueberry or blueberry and bifidobacteria were transfected with SIRT1 RNAi. After 8 weeks, all samples were then stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) (Marked as “H” in the figure) or Oil Red O (Marked as “O” in the figure) to evaluate the degrees of NAFLD (200x). CG (H): in control group, hepatocytes were arranged radially around a central vein and the basic structure of hepatic lobule portal area could be clearly visible. A few small-size cavities could be observed. CG (O): in control group, the number and size of red lipid droplets were very small. MG (H): in NAFLD model group, the structure of hepatic cords was heavily destroyed and many large-size cavities appeared. MG (O): in NAFLD model group, many large-size red lipid droplets were clearly visible in the adipose cells. SI (H): in SIRT1 RNAi group, the structure of hepatic cords was also heavily destroyed and many large-size cavities appeared. SI (O): in SIRT1 RNAi group, many large-size red lipid droplets were also clearly visible in the adipose cells. BJ (H): in blueberry juice group, the destroyed hepatic cords were basically repaired and orderly arranged around a central vein. A few small-size cavities could be observed. BJ (O): in blueberry juice group, many small-size red lipid droplets appeared. BJSI (H): in blueberry juice and SIRT1 RNAi group, the structure of hepatic cords was destroyed and middle-large cavities appeared. BJSI (O): in blueberry juice and SIRT1 RNAi group, many middle-large red lipid droplets appeared. BJB (H): in blueberry juice and bifidobacteria group, the destroyed hepatic cords were repaired completely and neatly arranged around a central vein. Only a few small cavities could be observed. BJB (O): in blueberry juice and bifidobacteria group, a few small-size red lipid droplets were observed. BJBSI (H): in blueberry juice and bifidobacteria and SIRT1 RNAi group, the structure of hepatic cords was destroyed. Some small- and middle-large cavities appeared. BJBSI (O): in blueberry juice and bifidobacteria and SIRT1 RNAi group, many small-size red lipid droplets were observed.

3.2. Effects of Blueberry Juice and Bifidobacteria on Hepatic Lipid Accumulation Assay

Analysis of hepatic lipid accumulation showed that high levels of lipids were also found in MG, SI, BJSI, and BJBSI groups compared with those in CG, BJ, and BJP groups (, Figure 3). SIRT1 RNAi increased the lipid levels compared to a model group (, Figure 3). The result suggested that blueberry juice and bifidobacteria affects lipid levels. The combination of blueberry juice and bifidobacteria significantly controlled lipids levels, which were similar with those from a control group.

Figure 3

Lipid accumulation in normal rats and NAFLD model rats. CG: a group with normal rats was assigned as a control group; MG: NAFLD model group; SI: SIRT1 RNAi group; BJ: blueberry juice group; BJSI: blueberry juice + SIRT1 RNAi group; BJB: blueberry juice + bifidobacteria group; BJBSI: blueberry juice + bifidobacteria + SIRT1 RNAi group. versus a CG group; ^△ versus a MG group; versus a SI group; ^● versus a BJ group; ^# versus a BJSI group; ^■ versus a BJB group; versus a BJBSI group. All the data were presented as ().

3.3. Histopathology Analysis

Immunohistochemistry staining indicated that SIRT1 was expressed in nucleus (Figure 4). SIRT1-positive staining was restricted to hepatic cells in control, BJ, and BJB groups, and a significantly stronger immune staining was noted in these groups. In MG, SI, BJSI, and BJBSI groups, SIRT1 was weaker immune staining with very light brown color. Compared with SIRT1, SREBP-1c was expressed in cytoplasm (Figure 5). SREBP-1c-negative staining was restricted to hepatic cells in CG, BJ, and BJB groups, and a significantly weaker immune staining was noted in these groups. In MG, SI, BJSI, and BJBSI groups, SREBP-1c was stronger immune staining with very light brown color. Just like SREBP-1c, PPAR-α was also expressed in cytoplasm (Figure 6). In contrast, PPAR-α-positive staining was restricted to hepatic cells in CG, BJ, and BJB groups, and a significantly stronger immune staining was noted in these groups (Figure 6). In MG, SI, BJSI, and BJBSI groups, PPAR-α was weaker immune staining with very light brown color (Figure 6). All the results suggested that SIRT1 can upregulate the expression of PPAR-α and downregulate the level of SREBP-1c.

Figure 4

Immunohistochemistry analysis for the effect of blueberry juice and bifidobacteria on SIRT1 expression in NAFLD rat livers (200x). CG: in control group, SIRT1 was highly expressed in nucleus with brown color. MG: in NAFLD model group, SIRT1 was lowly expressed with very light brown color. SI: in NAFLD model group with SIT1 RNAi, SIRT1 was little expressed with light blue color. BJ: in blueberry juice group, SIRT1 was highly expressed in nucleus with brown color. BJSI: in blueberry juice and SIRT1 RNAi group, the expression of SIRT1 was significantly inhibited with very light brown color. BJB: in blueberry juice and bifidobacteria group, SIRT1 was highly expressed in nucleus with brown color. BJBSI: in blueberry juice and bifidobacteria and SIRT1 RNAi group, the expression of SIRT1 was completely inhibited with blue color.

Figure 5

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis for the effect of blueberry juice and bifidobacteria on SREBP-1c expression in NAFLD rat livers (200x). CG: in control group, SREBP-1c was lowly expressed with light brown color. MG: in NAFLD model group, SREBP-1c was highly expressed with dark brown color. SI: in NAFLD model group with SIRT1 RNAi, SREBP-1c was highly expressed with dark brown color. BJ: in blueberry juice group, SREBP-1c was lowly expressed with light brown color. BJSI: in blueberry juice and SIRT1 RNAi group, the expression of SREBP-1c was significantly enhanced with dark brown color. BJB: in blueberry juice and bifidobacteria group, SREBP-1c was lowly expressed with light brown color. BJBSI: in blueberry juice and bifidobacteria and SIRT1 RNAi group, the expression of SREBP-1c was significantly enhanced with dark brown color.

Figure 6

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis for the effect of blueberry juice and bifidobacteria on PPAR-α expression in NAFLD rat livers (200x). CG: in control group, PPAR-α was highly expressed in cytoplasm with brown color. MG: in NAFLD model group, PPAR-α was lowly expressed in cytoplasm with very light brown color. SI: in NAFLD model group with SIRT1 RNAi, PPAR-α was lowly expressed in cytoplasm with very light brown color. BJ: in blueberry juice group, PPAR-α was highly expressed in cytoplasm with brown color. BJSI: in blueberry juice and SIRT1 RNAi group, the expression of PPAR-α was significantly inhibited with very light brown color. BJB: in blueberry juice and bifidobacteria group, PPAR-α was highly expressed in cytoplasm with brown color. BJBSI: in blueberry juice and bifidobacteria and SIRT1 RNAi group, the expression of PPAR-α was completely inhibited with blue color.

3.4. Effects of Blueberry Juice and Bifidobacteria on the mRNA Levels of SIRT1, SREBP-1c, and PPAR-α

We investigated the effect of blueberry on the mRNA levels of SIRT1 [47], SREBP-1c, and PPAR-α [48], which are biomarkers of NAFLD and activation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) [49]. The mRNA levels of SIRT1 and PPAR-α were significantly increased in CG, BJ, and BJB groups compared with those in MG, SI, BJSI, and BJBSI groups (, Figure 7). Comparatively, the levels of SREBP-1c were significantly decreased in CG, BJ, and BJB groups compared with those in MG, SI, BJSI, and BJBSI groups (, Figure 7). All the results suggested that blueberry juice and bifidobacteria affected the mRNA levels of SIRT1, SREBP-1c, and PPAR-α.

Figure 7

Effect of blueberry juice and bifidobacteria on mRNA levels of SIRT1, SREBP-1c, and PPAR-a in NAFLD rat livers. In control group (CG), the mRNA levels of SIRT1 and PPAR-α were high while the level of SREBP-1c was low. In NAFLD model group (MG) or model group with SIRT1 RNAi (SI), the mRNA levels of SIRT1 and PPAR-α were low while the level of SREBP-1c was high. In blueberry juice group (BJ), the mRNA levels of SIRT1 and PPAR-α were high while the level of SREBP-1c was low. In blueberry juice and SIRT1 RNAi group (BJSI), the mRNA levels of SIRT1 and PPAR-α were very low while the level of SREBP-1c was high. In blueberry juice and bifidobacteria group (BJB), the mRNA levels of SIRT1 and PPAR-α were very high while the level of SREBP-1c was low. In blueberry juice and bifidobacteria and SIRT1 RNAi group (BJBSI), the mRNA levels of SIRT1 and PPAR-α were very low while the level of SREBP-1c was high. Error bars indicate SD (). versus the control group, ^# versus the model group.

3.5. Effects of Blueberry Juice and Bifidobacteria on the Protein Levels of SIRT1, SREBP-1c, and PPAR-α

Western blot analysis showed that high levels of SIRT1 and PPAR-α expression were also found in CG, BJ, and BJP groups compared with those in MG, SI, BJSI, and BJBSI groups (, Figure 8). Comparatively, the protein levels of PPAR-α were significantly decreased in CG, BJ, and BJB groups compared with those in MG, SI, BJSI, and BJBSI groups (, Figure 8). All the results suggested that blueberry juice and bifidobacteria affects the protein levels of SIRT1, SREBP-1c, and PPAR-α.

Figure 8

Effect of blueberry juice and bifidobacteria on protein expression of SIRT1, SREBP-1c, and PPAR-a in NAFLD rat livers. In control group (CG), the protein levels of SIRT1 and PPAR-α were high while the level of SREBP-1c was low. In NAFLD model group (MG) or model group with SIRT1 RNAi (SI), the protein levels of SIRT1 and PPAR-α were low while the level of SREBP-1c was high. In blueberry juice group (BJ), the protein levels of SIRT1 and PPAR-α were high while the level of SREBP-1c was low. In blueberry juice and SIRT1 RNAi group (BJSI), the protein levels of SIRT1 and PPAR-α were very low while the level of SREBP-1c was high. In blueberry juice and bifidobacteria group (BJB), the protein levels of SIRT1 and PPAR-α were high while the level of SREBP-1c was low. In blueberry juice and bifidobacteria and SIRT1 RNAi group (BJBSI), the protein levels of SIRT1 and PPAR-α were very low while the level of SREBP-1c was high. Error bars indicate SD (). versus the control group, ^# versus the model group.

3.6. Effects of Blueberry Juice and Bifidobacteria on Biochemical Parameters of Enzyme Activities

Next we explored whether blueberry juice affected reactive oxidative species (ROS) in liver because ROS plays an important role in NAFLD hepatocytes damage and fibrosis formation [50, 51]. We measured the haptic tissue levels of SOD, AST, ALT, and GSH, the markers of oxidative stress [36–41]. As shown in Table 1, blueberry juice and bifidobacteria consumption significantly increased SOD and GSH levels in the liver compared with those in MG, SI, BJSI, and BJBSI groups. Although blueberry juice could also increase SOD and GSH levels, blueberry juice and bifidobacteria enhanced the levels higher than only blueberry juice did ().

Serum activities of AST and ALT were also measured to determine the degree of NAFLD. Consistent with previous histological data, blueberry juice and bifidobacteria could significantly lower serum activities of AST and ALT compared with those from MG, SI, BJSI, and BJBSI groups (Table 1). All the changes could be inhibited when SIRT1 was silenced. The results suggested that the bioactivities of these enzymes are regulated by SIRT1-mediated signaling pathway.

3.7. Effects of Blueberry Juice and Bifidobacteria on Biochemical Parameters of Lipid Metabolism

The analysis of biochemical parameters of lipid metabolism showed that the levels of serum TC, TG, LDL-c, and MDA were reduced significantly after blueberry juice and bifidobacteria consumption compared with MG, SI, BJSI, and BJBSI groups () (Table 2). The levels reached the lowest level when blueberry juice and bifidobacteria were compared with a BJ group (). Blueberry juice and bifidobacteria reduced the degrees of NAFLD and the result was closely related with a decrease in serum TC, TG, LDL-c, and MDA and an increase in HDL-c (Table 2, ). Thus, the ratio of TG/HDL-c was significantly decreased after blueberry juice and bifidobacteria consumption. Lipid peroxidation product was decreased and antioxidant product was increased, which significantly ameliorates the hepatic damage.

4. Discussion

NAFLD has been reported to be the most common chronic liver disease and heavy burden of liver-related diseases in the world [52–55]. NAFLD therapies often include lifestyle modifications and pharmaceutical therapy [56–59]. However, the long-term lifestyle modification is hard to be performed. Most of medicine has adverse effects which limit its usage [60]. Thus, it is necessary to explore the novel way with fewer side effects and high therapeutic efficiency. Blueberry is a kind of fruits and widely used in the world. Bifidobacteria have been widely used for the production of yogurt [61]. Both blueberry juice and bifidobacteria have been reported to improve the symptoms of liver disease [62, 63], so blueberry juice and bifidobacteria may be an effective way for the therapy of NAFLD.

To understand the effects of blueberry and bifidobacteria on NAFLD, hepatic injury induced by high-fat diet is a well-established animal model for studying NAFLD [64, 65]. To explore the detail molecular mechanisms of effects of blueberry and bifidobacteria on NAFLD model, sirtuins may be the best candidates for the purpose. Sirtuins belong to Class III histone/protein deacetylases and there are seven kinds of sirtuins in mammals [66]. Among the sirtuins, SIRT1 is well known and widely studied. SIRT1 can regulate protein activation by deacetylating that plays a critical role in the pathophysiology of metabolic disorders, such as NAFLD. Recent work has indicated that the protein level of SIRT expression is significantly reduced in NAFLD rats fed, and the high expression of SIRT1 prevents mice from developing NAFLD [67]. Our previous work showed that blueberry juice could increase expression of Nrf2 and HO-1 in primary hepatic stellate cells [68], which is also regulated by SIRT1-mediated pathway [69]. SIRT1 can affect the mRNA level of Nrf2, Nqo1, and HO-1 in liver and have protective functions for liver jury. Probiotics and blueberry can be beneficial to protect against hepatotoxicity [23]. Bifidobacteria interventions have been reported as a potential way for the therapy of liver disease [70]. Therefore, here we considered the function of blueberry juice and bifidobacteria for improving the symptoms of NAFLD. Meanwhile, we consider the regulation of SIRT1 for other biomarkers involved with lipid metabolism, such as PPAR-α and SREBP-1c [71, 72]. Here, we showed that blueberry juice and bifidobacteria significantly increased SIRT1 and PPAR-α expression in the liver, which prevents the progression of NAFLD, suggesting a potentially important role of SIRT1 and PPAR-α in blueberry juice and bifidobacteria medicating protection against NAFLD. In other words, we found the possible therapeutic mechanisms of blueberry juice and bifidobacteria for improving NAFLD by activating SIRTI-mediating signaling pathway.

For further mechanism, blueberry can increase the efficient antioxidant activity [73, 74] and the antioxidant activity of bifidobacteria has been often reported [21]. Therefore, we explored the functional synergism between blueberry juice and bifidobacteria. Here, we proved that that blueberry juice and bifidobacteria consumption significantly attenuates NAFLD, which is better than the function of blueberry juice alone if considering the biochemical parameter indexes and the changes for the levels of biomarker () (Tables 1 and 2, Figures 2 to 7). Blueberry juice and bifidobacteria can enhance the expression of SIRT1, which upregulates the protein levels of PPAR-α and downregulates the levels of SREBP-1c. The changes of all these molecules can increase the levels of SOD and GSH and decrease the levels of MDA, ALT, and AST, resulting in the increase of HDL-c and decrease of TG, TC, and LDL-c. All these results suggested that the blueberry juice and bifidobacteria can improve the biochemical indexes of NAFLD by activating SIRT1-mediated pathway.

Certainly, there is still some important work which is not considered here. For example, PPARg coactivator 1α (PGC-1α) plays an important role in the sirtuin signaling pathway by modulating liver fatty acid oxidation. SIRT1 deacetylation of PGC-1α is necessary for acting the bioactivities of mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation genes. SIRT1 can maintain the oxidation of fatty acid at low glucose concentrations. SIRT1 is a regulator of PGC-1α that induces the transcription of metabolic relevant genes for the oxidation of mitochondrial fatty acid [75]. Furthermore, the intake of high-fat diets can increase the level of PGC-1α in rats [76]. Another example is that blueberry juice is richly armed with a source of procyanidins [77], which are more effective antioxidant agents [78]. The function of procyanidins is not unique and other functions can still be explored in the future [79]. Bifidobacteria can affect the signaling pathway of many cytokines [80] and may play a more important role in the combination therapy for NAFLD. Thus, the limitation of the work is that the precise relationship is still unclear between blueberry juice and bifidobacteria and the regulation of SIRT1-mediated signaling pathway. The detail components will be analyzed in blueberry juice and bifidobacteria in the future, which is the basis for exploring the molecular mechanisms for the functions of blueberry juice and bifidobacteria.

5. Conclusions

We demonstrated that the protective effect of blueberry juice and bifidobacteria for NAFLD is associated with elevated hepatic expression of SIRT1, which upregulates the protein expression of PPAR-α and downregulates the level of SREBP-1c. The changes can increase the activity of SOD and GSH and decrease the activity of ALT and AST, which results in the increase of HDL-c and the decrease of TG, TC, LDL-c, and MDA. All these changes reduce oxidative stress in NAFLD rat and improve the symptoms. We therefore propose that dietary supplementation of blueberry juice and bifidobacteria can augment antioxidative capability of the liver presumably via stimulating SIRT1-mediated signaling pathway.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Authors’ Contribution

Tingting Ren and Chao Huang contributed equally to this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their great gratitude to the editor and all three anonymous reviewers who provided them with precious comments that significantly improved the paper. The work was supported by the Department of Science and Technology of Guizhou Province for Traditional Chinese Medicine Modernization (Grant no. ZY3017), the Foundation of the Governor of Guizhou Province (44), and the National Foundation for Educational Teams of China (12).

References

L. Shen, J.-G. Fan, Y. Shao et al., “Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver among administrative officers in Shanghai: an epidemiological survey,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1106–1110, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Cigremis, H. Turel, K. Adiguzelet et al., “The effects of acute acetaminophen toxicity on hepatic mRNA expression of SOD, CAT, GSH-Px, and levels of peroxynitrite, nitric oxide, reduced glutathione, and malondialdehyde in rabbit,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 323, no. 1-2, pp. 31–38, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Engelmann, G. F. Hoffmann, J. Grulich-Henn, and U. Teufel, “Alanine aminotransferase elevation in obese infants and children: a marker of early onset non alcoholic fatty liver disease,” Hepatitis Monthly, vol. 14, no. 4, Article ID e14112, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Sert, Ö. Pirgon, E. Aypar, H. Yilmaz, and B. Dündar, “Relationship between aspartate aminotransferase to-platelet ratio index and carotid intima-media thickness in obese adolescents with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease,” Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 182–188, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Fabbrini, B. S. Mohammed, K. M. Korenblat et al., “Effect of fenofibrate and niacin on intrahepatic triglyceride content, very low-density lipoprotein kinetics, and insulin action in obese subjects with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 2727–2735, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. C. Chan, G. F. Watts, S. Gan, A. T. Y. Wong, E. M. M. Ooi, and P. H. R. Barrett, “Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease as the transducer of hepatic oversecretion of very-low-density lipoprotein-apolipoprotein B-100 in Obesity,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 1043–1050, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Pacifico, E. Bonci, G. Andreoliet et al., “Association of serum triglyceride-to-HDL cholesterol ratio with carotid artery intima-media thickness, insulin resistance and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children and adolescents,” Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 737–743, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
V. Nobili, B. Donati, N. Panera et al., “A 4-polymorphism risk score predicts steatohepatitis in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease,” Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 632–636, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Qiang, Y. Xu, Y. Lu et al., “Autofluorescence of MDA-modified proteins as an in vitro and in vivo probe in oxidative stress analysis,” Protein and Cell, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 484–487, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. R. Sayed, “Ferulsinaic acid modulates SOD, GSH, and antioxidant enzymes in diabetic kidney,” Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2012, Article ID 580104, 9 pages, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Suzuki, H. Takeuchi, T. Kakita, M. Unno, Y. Katayose, and S. Matsuno, “The involvement of the intracellular superoxide production system in hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injuryIn vivo and in vitro experiments using transgenic mice manifesting excessive CuZn-SOD activity,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 756–763, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kotosai, S. Shimada, M. Kanda et al., “Plasma HDL reduces nonesterified fatty acid hydroperoxides originating from oxidized LDL: a mechanism for its antioxidant ability,” Lipids, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 569–578, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Doycheva and R. Loomba, “Effect of metformin on ballooning degeneration in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH): when to use metformin in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD),” Advances in Therapy, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 30–43, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. M. Riche, J. W. Fleming, S. S. Malinowski, C. A. Black, K. H. Miller, and M. R. Wofford, “Resistant nonalcoholic fatty liver disease amelioration with rosuvastatin and pioglitazone combination therapy in a patient with metabolic syndrome,” Annals of Pharmacotherapy, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 137–141, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Zhang, H. Xiang, Y. Fan et al., “The effects of sulfonylureas plus metformin on lipids, blood pressure, and adverse events in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials,” Endocrine, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 648–658, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Dodiya, V. Kale, S. Goswami, R. Sundar, and M. Jain, “Evaluation of adverse effects of lisinopril and rosuvastatin on hematological and biochemical analytes in wistar rats,” Toxicology International, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 170–176, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Valenti, P. Riso, A. Mazzocchi, M. Porrini, S. Fargion, and C. Agostoni, “Dietary anthocyanins as nutritional therapy for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2013, Article ID 145421, 8 pages, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Bornsek, L. Ziberna, T. Polak et al., “Bilberry and blueberry anthocyanins act as powerful intracellular antioxidants in mammalian cells,” Food Chemistry, vol. 134, no. 4, pp. 1878–1884, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Li, H. Sun, J. Pei et al., “De novo sequencing and comparative analysis of the blueberry transcriptome to discover putative genes related to antioxidants,” Gene, vol. 511, no. 1, pp. 54–61, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wang, M. Cheng, B. Zhang, F. Nie, and H. Jiang, “Dietary supplementation of blueberry juice enhances hepatic expression of metallothionein and attenuates liver fibrosis in rats,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 3, Article ID e58659, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. K. Chang, K.-H. Seol, S.-G. Jeong et al., “Casein hydrolysis by Bifidobacterium longum KACC91563 and antioxidant activities of peptides derived therefrom,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 96, no. 9, pp. 5544–5555, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Shen, N. Shang, and P. Li, “In vitro and in vivo antioxidant activity of bifidobacterium animalis 01 isolated from centenarians,” Current Microbiology, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 1097–1103, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Osman, D. Adawi, S. Ahrné, B. Jeppsson, and G. Molin, “Endotoxin- and D-galactosamine-induced liver injury improved by the administration of Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium and blueberry,” Digestive and Liver Disease, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 849–856, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Colak, A. Yesil, H. H. Mutluet et al., “A potential treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with SIRT1 activators,” Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 311–319, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. P. Gillum, D. M. Erion, and G. I. Shulman, “Sirtuin-1 regulation of mammalian metabolism,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 8–13, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Purushotham, T. T. Schug, Q. Xu, S. Surapureddi, X. Guo, and X. Li, “Hepatocyte-specific deletion of SIRT1 alters fatty acid metabolism and results in hepatic steatosis and inflammation,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 327–338, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Deplanque, P. Gelé, O. Pétrault et al., “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor- $α$ activation as a mechanism of preventive neuroprotection induced by chronic fenofibrate treatment,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 23, no. 15, pp. 6264–6271, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
W. M. Sun, Y. P. Wang, Y. Q. Duan et al., “Radix Hedysari polysaccharide suppresses lipid metabolism dysfunction in a rat model of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease via adenosine monophosphateactivated protein kinase pathway activation,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1237–1244, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Lamoureux, D. Roy, and S. F. Gauthier, “Production of oligosaccharides in yogurt containing bifidobacteria and yogurt cultures,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 1058–1069, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Cano, F. Ciaffoni, G. M. Safwat et al., “Hepatic VLDL assembly is disturbed in a rat model of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: is there a role for dietary coenzyme Q?” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 707–717, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. B. Hunt, J. A. Luff, L. Daniel, and R. V. D. Bergh, “Evaluation of hepatic steatosis in dogs with congenital portosystemic shunts using oil red o staining,” Veterinary Pathology, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1109–1115, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wang, R. A. Goulart, and L. Pantanowitz, “Oil red O staining in cytopathology,” Diagnostic Cytopathology, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 272–273, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. T. Feldman and D. Wolfe, “Tissue processing and hematoxylin and eosin staining,” in Histopathology, vol. 1180 of Methods in Molecular Biology, pp. 31–43, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Murakami, R. Takahashi, M. Ono et al., “Serodiagnosis of Helicobacter hepaticus infection in patients with liver and gastrointestinal diseases: western blot analysis and ELISA using a highly specific monoclonal antibody for H. hepaticus antigen,” Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 1120–1126, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Jelenik, U. Floegel, E. Phielixet et al., “Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and insulin resistance are associated with increased cardiac oxidative stress in mice,” European Heart Journal, vol. 34, pp. 931–932, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Dong, D. Li, H. Liu, and Y. Y. Zhao, “SOD3 and eNOS genotypes are associated with SOD activity and NOx,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 328–334, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Su, Q. Li, Y. liu et al., “Sesamin ameliorates doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity: Involvement of Sirt1 and Mn-SOD pathway,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 224, no. 2, pp. 257–263, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Kumar, K. Swaminathan, D. L. Clemens, and A. Dey, “GSH protects against oxidative stress and toxicity in VL-17A cells exposed to high glucose,” European Journal of Nutrition, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Jung, O. Y. Kim, M. Kim, J. Song, S. H. Lee, and J. H. Lee, “Age-related increase in alanine aminotransferase correlates with elevated levels of plasma amino acids, decanoylcarnitine, Lp-PLA2 activity, oxidative stress, and arterial stiffness,” Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 3467–3475, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Yamada, H. Tomiyama, M. Yambeet et al., “Elevated serum alanine aminotransferase is a marker of inflammation and oxidative stress associated with the metabolic syndrome,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 24, p. 193, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
H. H. Mansour, S. I. Nel, and H. F. Hafez, “Ameliorative effect of septilin, an ayurvedic preparation against γ-irradiation-induced oxidative stress and tissue injury in rats,” Indian Journal of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 135–141, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Paoletti and A. Mocali, “Determination of superoxide dismutase activity by purely chemical system based on NAD(P)H oxidation,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 186, pp. 209–220, 1990.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. J. Hissin and R. Hilf, “A fluorometric method for determination of oxidized and reduced glutathione in tissues,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 214–226, 1976.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Gastaldelli, M. Gaggini, and L. Mezzabotta, “Alteration in lipid metabolism after an oral fat load in subjects with NAFLD,” Diabetologia, vol. 56, p. S323, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Musso, R. Gambino, and M. Cassader, “Recent insights into hepatic lipid metabolism in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD),” Progress in Lipid Research, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. A. Gheita and S. A. Kenawy, “Measurement of malondialdehyde, glutathione, and glutathione peroxidase in SLE patients,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 1134, pp. 193–199, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Colak, O. Ozturk, E. Senates et al., “SIRT1 as a potential therapeutic target for treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease,” Medical Science Monitor, vol. 17, no. 5, article HY5-9, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Ziamajidi, S. Khaghani, G. Hassanzadehet et al., “Amelioration by chicory seed extract of diabetes- and oleic acid-induced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) via modulation of PPARalpha and SREBP-1,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 58, pp. 198–209, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
A. E. Feldstein, B. G. Papouchado, P. Angulo, S. Sanderson, L. Adams, and G. J. Gores, “Hepatic stellate cells and fibrosis progression in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease,” Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 384–389, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Sumida, E. Niki, Y. Naito, and T. Yoshikawa, “Involvement of free radicals and oxidative stress in NAFLD/NASH,” Free Radical Research, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 869–880, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Podrini, M. Borghesan, A. Greco, V. Pazienza, G. Mazzoccoli, and M. Vinciguerra, “Redox homeostasis and epigenetics in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD),” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 19, no. 15, pp. 2737–2746, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. M. Alkassabany, A. G. Farghaly, and E. M. El-Ghitany, “Prevalence, risk factors, and predictors of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease among schoolchildren: a hospital-based study in Alexandria, Egypt,” Arab Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 76–81, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Kalra, M. Vithalani, G. Gulati et al., “Study of prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in type 2 diabetes patients in India (SPRINT),” Journal of Association of Physicians of India, vol. 61, no. 7, pp. 448–453, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Malespin, B. Sleesman, A. Lau, S. S. Wong, and S. J. Cotler, “Prevalence and correlates of suspected nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Chinese American children,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. López-Velázquez, K. V. Silva-Vidal, G. Ponciano-Rodríguez et al., “The prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the Americas,” Annals of Hepatology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 166–178, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
G. F. Watts, “Nutrition and metabolism: nutritional therapy for disordered triglyceride metabolism and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease,” Current Opinion in Lipidology, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 545–547, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. B. Andrews and J. E. Lavine, “Medical therapy for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children and adolescents,” Expert Review of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–3, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Eckard, R. Cole, J. Lockwood et al., “Prospective histopathologic evaluation of lifestyle modification in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a randomized trial,” Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 249–259, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Tock, A. R. Dâmaso, A. de Piano et al., “Long-term effects of metformin and lifestyle modification on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease obese adolescents,” Journal of Obesity, vol. 2010, Article ID 831901, 6 pages, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. C. Smith, “Metformin as a treatment for antipsychotic drug side effects: special focus on women with schizophrenia,” The American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 169, no. 8, pp. 774–776, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. H. Marhamatizadeh, E. Ehsandoost, P. Gholami, and M. Nazemi, “Effect of Denak (Oliverici decumbens Vent) on growth and survival of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium bifidum for production of probiotic herbal milk and yoghurt,” Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 16, no. 24, pp. 2009–2014, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Bellavia, F. Rappa, M. Lo Belloet et al., “Lactobacillus casei and bifidobacterium lactis supplementation reduces tissue damage of intestinal mucosa and liver after 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid treatment in mice,” Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 251–261, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
İ. Bingül, C. Başaran-Küçükgergin, M. S. Tekkeşin, V. Olgaç, S. Doğru-Abbasoğlu, and M. Uysal, “Effect of blueberry pretreatment on diethylnitrosamine-induced oxidative stress and liver injury in rats,” Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 529–538, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. T. Jeon, R. W. Heo, H. J. Shin et al., “Attenuation by a Vigna nakashimae extract of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in high-fat diet-fed mice,” Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 482–489, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Liu, Z. J. Zhuang, D. X. Bian et al., “Toll-like receptor-4 signalling in the progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease induced by high-fat and high-fructose diet in mice,” Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 482–488, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Dai and D. V. Faller, “Transcription regulation by class III histone deacetylases (HDACs)—sirtuins,” Translational Oncogenomics, vol. 2008, no. 3, pp. 53–65, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Colak, O. Ozturk, E. Senates et al., “SIRT1 as a potential therapeutic target for treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease,” Medical Science Monitor, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. Hy5–Hy9, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. P. Wang, M. L. Cheng, B. F. Zhang et al., “Effect of blueberry on hepatic and immunological functions in mice,” Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases International, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 164–168, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Yang, W. Li, Y. Liu et al., “Alpha-lipoic acid improves high-fat diet-induced hepatic steatosis by modulating the transcription factors SREBP-1, FoxO1 and Nrf2 via the SIRT1/LKB1/AMPK pathway,” The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1207–1217, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Xu, B. Wang, Y. Fu et al., “Changes of fecal Bifidobacterium species in adult patients with hepatitis B virus-induced chronic liver disease,” Microbial Ecology, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 304–313, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Ponugoti, D. H. Kim, Z. Xiao et al., “SIRT1 deacetylates and inhibits SREBP-1C activity in regulation of hepatic lipid metabolism,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 44, pp. 33959–33970, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Wang, R. Teng, L. Di et al., “PPARa and sirt1 mediate erythropoietin action in increasing metabolic activity and browning of white adipocytes to protect against obesity and metabolic disorders,” Diabetes, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 4122–4131, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Correa-Betanzo, E. Allen-Vercoe, J. McDonald, K. Schroeter, M. Corredig, and G. Paliyath, “Stability and biological activity of wild blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium) polyphenols during simulated in vitro gastrointestinal digestion,” Food Chemistry, vol. 165, pp. 522–531, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Ozcelik, S. Uslu, D. Burukoglu et al., “Chitosan and blueberry treatment induces arginase activity and inhibits nitric oxide production during acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity,” Pharmacognosy Magazine, vol. 10, supplement 2, pp. S217–S224, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Zhao, F. Ling, T. M. Griffin et al., “Up-regulation of the Sirtuin 1 (Sirt1) and Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor γ Coactivator-1α (PGC-1α) Genes in White Adipose Tissue of Id1 Protein-deficient Mice: IMPLICATIONS IN THE PROTECTION AGAINST DIET AND AGE-INDUCED GLUCOSE INTOLERANCE,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 289, no. 42, pp. 29112–29122, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Feillet-Coudray, M. Aoun, G. Fouret et al., “Effects of long-term administration of saturated and n-3 fatty acid-rich diets on lipid utilisation and oxidative stress in rat liver and muscle tissues,” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 110, no. 10, pp. 1789–1802, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. C. Khanal, L. R. Howard, C. R. Brownmiller, and R. L. Prior, “Influence of extrusion processing on procyanidin composition and total anthocyanin contents of blueberry pomace,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. H52–H58, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Li, L. Chen, T. Yang et al., “Increasing antioxidant activity of procyanidin extracts from the pericarp of Litchi chinensis processing waste by two probiotic bacteria bioconversions,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 2506–2512, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zhong and H. Cong, “Inhibition of grape procyanidin on the expression of SSTR-2 mRNA in the hepatic cells induced by N-nitroso compounds,” Wei Sheng Yan Jiu, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 430–432, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
T. S. Plantinga, W. W. C. Van Maren, J. Van Bergenhenegouwen, and ETAL, “Differential toll-like receptor recognition and induction of cytokine profile by Bifidobacterium breve and Lactobacillus strains of probiotics,” Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 621–628, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2014 Tingting Ren et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

2357

Downloads

1850

Citations