Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Is a Fast and Reliable Platform for Identification and Ecological Studies of Species from Family Rhizobiaceae

Abstract

Family Rhizobiaceae includes fast growing bacteria currently arranged into three genera, Rhizobium, Ensifer and Shinella, that contain pathogenic, symbiotic and saprophytic species. The identification of these species is not possible on the basis of physiological or biochemical traits and should be based on sequencing of several genes. Therefore alternative methods are necessary for rapid and reliable identification of members from family Rhizobiaceae. In this work we evaluated the suitability of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) for this purpose. Firstly, we evaluated the capability of this methodology to differentiate among species of family Rhizobiaceae including those closely related and then we extended the database of MALDI Biotyper 2.0 including the type strains of 56 species from genera Rhizobium, Ensifer and Shinella. Secondly, we evaluated the identification potential of this methodology by using several strains isolated from different sources previously identified on the basis of their rrs, recA and atpD gene sequences. The 100% of these strains were correctly identified showing that MALDI-TOF MS is an excellent tool for identification of fast growing rhizobia applicable to large populations of isolates in ecological and taxonomic studies.

Introduction

The family Rhizobiaceae currently contains fast growing species of bacteria that may be saprophytic or able to establish beneficial or deleterious plant interactions. These species are currently arranged into three genera, Rhizobium, Ensifer and Shinella [1], [2]. The former genera Agrobacterium and Allorhizobium are now included in genus Rhizobium [3] and Sinorhizobium is currently named Ensifer [4]. The identification of members of the family Rhizobiaceae is necessarily based on gene sequencing since there is not phenotypic information that allows the differentiation and identification of rhizobial species [3]. Therefore, although gene sequencing is the most reliable method for identification of rhizobia, it is still a tedious and time-consuming method to be applied to wide populations and therefore alternative methods are necessary for reliable identification of these bacteria shortening the time needed to achieve this process.

Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has been suggested as a fast and reliable method for bacterial identification, based on the characteristic protein profiles for each microorganism. Using this technology it has been estimated that up to 99% of strains tested are correctly identified when comparing with commercial phenotypic identification panels or rrs gene sequencing [5][8]. However MALDI-TOF MS has been basically applied to the identification of clinical isolates [9][16] so most of the species currently included on available databases are those of clinical interest. For example in the case of family Rhizobiaceae only the type strains of three species, Rhizobium tropici, Rhizobium radiobacter and Rhizobium rubi, and eight pathogenic non-type strains of R. radiobacter, R. rhizogenes and Agrobacterium tumefaciens (currently R. radiobacter) are included in Biotyper 2.0 database (Bruker Daltonics) used in this study.

Therefore the objectives of this work were: (i) the evaluation of MALDI-TOF MS technology for species differentiation within family Rhizobiaceae, (ii) the construction of a database that includes the type strains of currently accepted species within family Rhizobiaceae and (iii) the validation of the MALDI-TOF MS technology to identify rhizobial strains isolated from nodules and tumours previously identified by gene sequencing.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

To build a reference database for MALDI-TOF MS-based rhizobial species identification, the type strains of 56 species belonging to the family Rhizobiaceae were used (Table 1). In addition 35 strains isolated from legume nodules or plant tumours previously characterized by gene sequencing were used to validate MALDI-TOF MS as an identification tool for this group of bacteria (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 1. Type strains of family Rhizobiaceae included in the extended database for MALDI-TOF MS- based species identification.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020223.t001

thumbnail
Table 2. MALDI BioTyper identification results for family Rhizobiaceae strains.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020223.t002

In order to establish the more adequate medium and growth conditions for fast-growing rhizobia analysis, selected strains were cultivated on TY [17] and YMA plates [18] and incubated at 28°C for 24 and 48 hours.

Sample preparation for MALDI-TOF MS

Cells of a whole colony were transferred from the plate to a 1.5 ml tube (Eppendorf, Germany) with a pipette tip and mixed thoroughly in 300 µl of water to resuspend the bacterial cells. Then, 900 µl of absolute ethanol was added and the mixture was centrifuged at 15,500 g for 2 min, and the supernatant was discarded. The pellet was air-dried at room temperature for 1 hour. Subsequently, 50 µl of formic acid (70% v/v) was added to the pellet and mixed thoroughly before the addition of 50 µl acetonitrile to the mixture. The mixture was centrifuged again at 15,500 g for 2 min. One microliter of the supernatant was placed onto a spot of the steel target and air-dried at room temperature. Each sample was overlaid with 1 µl of matrix solution and air-dried.

MALDI-TOF MS

Measurements were performed on an Autoflex III MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Leipzig, Germany) equipped with a 200-Hz smartbeam laser. Spectra were recorded in the linear, positive mode at a laser frequency of 200 Hz within a mass range from 2,000 to 20,000 Da. The IS1 voltage was 20 kV, the IS2 voltage was maintained at 18.6 kV, the lens voltage was 6 kV, and the extraction delay time was 40 ns.

For each spectrum, 500 laser shots were collected and analyzed (10×50 laser shots from different positions of the target spot). The spectra were calibrated externally using the standard calibrant mixture (Escherichia coli extracts including the additional proteins RNase A and myoglobin, Bruker Daltonics). Calibration masses were as follows: RL36, 4364.3 Da; RS22, 5095.8 Da; RL34, 5380.4 Da; RL33meth, 6254.4 Da; RL32, 6315 Da; RL29, 7273.5 Da; RS19, 10299.1 Da; RNase A, 13682.2 Da; myoglobin, 16952.5 Da.

Spectrum generation and data analysis

For automated data analysis, raw spectra were processed using the MALDI Biotyper 2.0 software (Bruker Daltonics, Leipzig, Germany) at default settings. The software performs normalization, smoothing, baseline subtraction, and peak picking, creating a list of the most significant peaks of the spectrum (m/z values with a given intensity, with the threshold set to a minimum of 1% of the highest peak and a maximum of 100 peaks). To identify unknown bacteria, each peak list generated was matched directly against reference libraries (3,476 species) using the integrated patterns matching algorithm of the Biotyper 2.0 software (Bruker Daltonics, GmbH, Germany). The unknown spectra were compared with a library of reference spectra based on a pattern recognition algorithm using peak position, peak intensity distributions and peak frequencies. Once a spectrum has been generated and captured by the software, the whole identification process was performed automatically, without any user intervention. MALDI-TOF MS identifications were classified using modified score values proposed by the manufacturer: a score value ≥2 indicated species identification; a score value between 1.7 and 1.9 indicated genus identification, and a score value <1.7 indicated no identification.

For reference library construction, 36 independent spectra were recorded for each bacterial isolate (three independent measurements at twelve different spots each). Manual/visual estimation of the mass spectra was performed using Flex Analysis 3.0 (Bruker Daltonics GmbH, Germany) performing smoothing and baseline substraction. Checking existence of flatlines, outliers or single spectra with remarkable peaks differing from the other spectra was done, taking into account that mass deviation within the spectra set shall not be more than 500 ppm. Finally, 20 spectra were selected, removing questionable spectra from the collection. To create peak lists of the spectra, the BioTyper software was used as described above. The 20 independent peak lists of a strain were used for automated “main spectrum” generation with default settings of the BioTyper software. Thereby, for each library entry a reference peak list (main spectrum) which contains information about average masses, average intensities, and relative abundances in the 20 measurements for all characteristic peaks of a given strain was created, so a main spectrum displayed the most reproducible peaks typical for a certain bacterial strain.

Cluster analysis was performed based on comparison of strain-specific main spectra created as described above. The dendrogram was constructed by the statistical toolbox of Matlab 7.1 (MathWorks Inc., USA) integrated in the MALDI Biotyper 2.0 software. The parameter settings were: ‘Distance Measure = Euclidian’ and ‘Linkage = complete’. The linkage function is normalized according to the distance between 0 (perfect match) and 1000 (no match).

Phylogenetic analyses

The results of MALDI-TOF MS analysis were compared with those obtained after rrs, recA, atpD and nodC gene sequence analyses. In this work we obtained some sequences of these genes that are absent in databases according to Rivas et al. [19] for rrs gene, Gaunt et al. [20] for recA and atpD genes and Laguerre et al. [21] for nodC gene. The sequences were aligned using the Clustal W software [22]. The distances were calculated according to Kimura's two-parameter model [23]. Phylogenetic trees were inferred using the neighbour-joining method [24] and the MEGA 4.0 package [25].

Results and Discussion

Database setting

In Biotyper 2.0 database only three species of genus Rhizobium are included and none of genus Ensifer or Shinella. Therefore a database extension in order to include the species currently described in these genera is necessary before applying MALDI-TOF MS to the identification of rhizobial isolates.

Owing to the fact that in Biotyper 2.0 database the type strains of three species of genus Rhizobium are already included, R. tropici DSM 11418T, R. rubi DSM 6772T and R. radiobacter DSM 30147T, we verified the reproducibility of MALDI-TOF MS using the type strains of these species that were cultivated in two different media (YMA and TY) and incubated at 24 and 48 h.

The results obtained showed that the analysed strains matched with high score values (higher than 2.5) with each corresponding type strain already present in Biotyper 2.0 database when TY medium and 24 h incubation were used (Table 3). Lower score values were found with YMA medium incubated at 24 h and only R. rubi ATCC 13335T and R. radiobacter ATCC 19358T were correctly identified with score values higher than 2 (Table 3). This was probably due to the production of higher amounts of exopolysaccharide in YMA medium which makes the sample preparation difficult. After an incubation time of 48 h the score values were lower when both TY and YMA media were used and only R. rubi ATCC 13335T and R. radiobacter ATCC 19358T were correctly identified using YMA medium. Therefore best results for rhizobial species were obtained with TY medium and 24 h incubation, in spite of previous studies that have demonstrated high reproducibility of MALDI-TOF MS analysis in different culture media and growth phases [14], [26], [27].

thumbnail
Table 3. Comparison of identification results by MALDI-TOF MS with different conditions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020223.t003

Before the extension of Biotyper 2.0 database we also checked the suitability of MALDI-TOF MS system to differentiate the spectra of representative species from the three genera currently accepted in Family Rhizobiaceae.

Firstly we compared the spectra of the type strains from the type species of the three genera currently included in family Rhizobiaceae. The results obtained showed that the spectra of Rhizobium leguminosarum USDA 2370T, Ensifer adhaerens LMG 20216T and Shinella granuli DSM18401T were clearly distinguishable since there were not common peaks among their spectra (figure 1).

thumbnail
Figure 1. MALDI-TOF MS spectra of whole-cell extracts obtained from the type strains of two close and one divergent species from each genus analysed in this study: (A) Rhizobium, (B) Ensifer and (C) Shinella.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020223.g001

Subsequently, we analyzed the spectra of two phylogenetically close and one phylogenetically divergent species from each genus. We selected from genus Rhizobium the close species R. leguminosarum (type species of genus Rhizobium) and R. pisi as well as the species R. cellulosilyticum, phylogenetically distant from them. From genus Ensifer we chose the close species E. meliloti and E. medicae and the species E. adhaerens, which is the type species of genus Ensifer and it is phylogenetically distant from the other two species. Finally, from genus Shinella we chose the close species S. granuli, type species of genus Shinella, and S. kummerowiae and the phylogenetically distant S. fusca.

All these spectra were quite different with almost any common peaks among those of species belonging to different genera as we previously observed for the type species of each genus. Within the same genus the spectra of close species were more similar than those from divergent species. For example, considering the mass tolerance ±2 m/z for each peak as we have previously described [13], in genus Rhizobium, R. leguminosarum USDA 2370T and R. pisi DSM 30132T shared peaks at 3126, 4689, 6773, 7298 and 9380 Da that are not in R. cellulosilyticum ALAB2T (figure 1A). In genus Ensifer, peaks at 2502, 2605, 4652, 5005, 5211 and 9304 Da were present in E. meliloti ATCC 9930T and E. medicae USDA 1037T and not in E. adherens LMG 20216T, although there are two common peaks in the three species compared (3741 and 7484 Da). (figure 1B). In genus Shinella, we found peaks at 5006, 4613 and 2504 Da in S. granuli and S. kummerowiae that were not present in S. fusca and, although S. fusca shared few peaks with S. granuli (3615, 3723, 7229, 7444 Da), this phylogenetically distant species had many specific peaks that were not in the other two species (2070, 2237, 2326, 2497, 3254, 5096, 6351, 6507 Da) (figure 1C).

These results showed that the spectra of both phylogenetically close and distant species from the same genus, as well as those of species of different genera within family Rhizobiaceae can be differentiated by MALDI-TOF MS. Therefore we extended the database MALDI BioTyper 2.0 with 56 type strains of species from genera Rhizobium, Ensifer and Shinella belonging to Family Rhizobiaceae (Table 1).

Comparison between MALDI-TOF MS and phylogenetic analyses

To compare the data obtained by MALDI-TOF MS analysis with those based on gene sequence analysis (figures 2, 3 and 4), a cluster analysis was performed based on a correlation matrix using the integrated tools of the MALDI Biotyper 2.0 software package. Figure 5 showed that the genus Rhizobium was divided into several clusters whose distribution basically coincided with that observed after rrs, recA and atpD gene analyses. The results evidenced that some reclassifications performed within genus Rhizobium are correct as occurs in the case of the former species Agrobacterium tumefaciens reclassified into A. radiobacter [28]. MALDI-TOF MS results confirmed that they are the same species since their type strains held in different collections matched with score values higher than 2 (Table 2A and 2B). These results are congruent with those obtained from recA and atpD gene analyses since these strains presented nearly identical sequences (figures 3 and 4). After reclassification of the complete genus Agrobacterium into Rhizobium, the current valid name for these species is Rhizobium radiobacter [3].

thumbnail
Figure 2. Neighbour-joining phylogenetic rooted tree based on 16S rRNA sequences (about 1475 nt) showing the taxonomic location of the species included in this study.

Bootstrap values calculated for 1000 replications are indicated. Bar, 1 nt substitution per 100 nt. Accesion numbers from Genbank are given in brackets.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020223.g002

thumbnail
Figure 3. Neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree based on recA gene sequences (about 520 nt) showing the position of species included in this study.

Bootstrap values calculated for 1000 replications are indicated. Bar, 2 nt substitution per 100 nt. Accesion numbers from Genbank are given in brackets.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020223.g003

thumbnail
Figure 4. Neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree based on atpD gene sequences (about 500 nt) showing the position of species included in this study.

Bootstrap values calculated for 1000 replications are indicated. Bar, 2 nt substitution per 100 nt. Accesion numbers from Genbank are given in brackets.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020223.g004

thumbnail
Figure 5. Cluster analysis of MALDI-TOF MS spectra of different species and strains from the genus Rhizobium.

Distance is displayed in relative units.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020223.g005

MALDI-TOF MS analysis also confirmed the R. trifolii ATCC 14480 reclassification into R. leguminosarum [29], since the strain ATCC 14480 matched with R. leguminosarum USDA 2370T with a score value higher than 2 (Table 2B), and Blastobacter aggregatus DSM 1111T into R. aggregatum [30] since strain DSM 1111T clustered with species of genus Rhizobium (Figure 5).

On the contrary, some species of genus Rhizobium were erroneously reclassified. For example, R. phaseoli type strain was reclassified into R. leguminosarum [31]. Later the biovar phaseoli type I of this species was reclassified into R. etli [32], so it was not clear the location of the R. phaseoli type strain. A revision based on rrs, recA and atpD analysis showed that R. phaseoli is a valid species distinguishable from both R. leguminosarum and R. etli [29]. The results of the MALDI-TOF MS confirmed these results since R. phaseoli ATCC 14482T matched with R. etli CFN42T with score values lower than 2 (Table 2C).

Moreover, the MALDI-TOF MS cluster analysis showed, in agreement with rrs, recA and atpD gene analyses, that some current Rhizobium species are indistinguishable (figures 2, 3, 4 and 5). For example, the type strains of R. mongolense, R. loessense and R. yanglingense matched with R. gallicum R602spT with score values higher than 2 (Table 2D). In addition, R. indigoferae CCBAU 71042T matched with R. leguminosarum USDA 2370T with a score value of 2.219 and R. fabae LMG 23997T matched with R. pisi DSM 30132T with a score value of 2.258 (Table 2D). Therefore the taxonomic status of all these species should be revised according to the current rules of bacterial taxonomy.

The genera Shinella and Ensifer MALDI-TOF cluster analysis was performed together (figure 6) since they are closely related on the basis of recA and atpD gene analyses (see figures 3 and 4). This closeness was confirmed after MALDI-TOF cluster analysis although the distribution of Shinella species was slightly different (figure 6). The species S. yambaruensis was the closest related species to S. granuli on the basis of MALDI-TOF MS analysis, whereas these two species were distant according to their rrs gene sequences (figure 2). However, S. yambaruensis DSM 18801T matched with S. granuli DSM 18401T with a score value lower than 2 corresponding to different species from the same genus.

thumbnail
Figure 6. Cluster analysis of MALDI-TOF MS spectra of different species and strains from the genera Ensifer and Shinella.

Distance is displayed in relative units.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020223.g006

The distribution of species in the genus Ensifer was coherent with those found after rrs analysis with E. medicae and E. meliloti forming the same group, E. morelense close to E. adhaerens and E. americanum (a not yet validated species) close to E. fredii (figure 6).

In the genus Ensifer also MALDI-TOF MS analysis confirmed some reclassifications as that of species E. xinjiangense into E. fredii [33] since the former type strains E. xinjiangense LMG 17930 and CECT 4657 matched with E. fredii LMG 6217T with score values of 2.413 and 2.151, respectively (Table 2B). Also was confirmed the reclassification of the strain Rhizobium sp. Br816 as Ensifer sp. [34], [35] since it clustered with E. americanum (figure 6). However, in agreement with rrs, recA and atpD gene analyses (figures 2, 3 and 4), strain Br816 does not belong to this species since it matched with E. americanum DSM 15007T with score values lower than 2 (Table 2G).

However, other reclassifications were not correct as occurs with E. morelense reclassified into E. adhaerens [36] since E. morelense Lc04T matched with E. adhaerens LMG 20216T with a score value of only 1.245 (Table 2C) in agreement with rrs, recA and atpD gene analyses (figures 2, 3 and 4).

In the genus Ensifer, also some species were indistinguishable, for example, E. kummerowiae CCBAU 71714T matched with E. meliloti ATCC 9930T with a score value of 2.261 suggesting that they belong to the same species (Table 2D). Since this result coincides with the analysis of rrs, recA and atpD genes, the taxonomic status of E. kummerowiae should be revised.

All these findings showed that MALDI-TOF MS results are comparable to those obtained after the phylogenetic analysis of core genes from members of family Rhizobiaceae including that of rrs gene in which is currently based the classification within this family [1]. These results are in agreement with those previously reported for other bacterial groups [37] and therefore we analysed the potential of MALDI-TOF MS for identification of fast-growing rhizobia isolates.

Identification of rhizobial strains by MALDI-TOF MS

To prove the suitability of the extended MALDI Biotyper 2.0 database for routine identification and discrimination of fast-growing rhizobial species we analysed several strains previously identified by rrs and housekeeping gene sequencing belonging to different species and genera of family Rhizobiaceae (Table 2F and 2G).

The species R. leguminosarum contains some strains with identical rrs gene and divergent recA and atpD genes [29], [38], [39]. For example, the strains RPVF18, RVS11 and ATCC 14480 have housekeeping genes closely related to the type strain of this species USDA 2370T and other strains have phylogenetically distant ones, such as RPVR31, CVIII4 and RTP05 (figures 3 and 4). Although all these strains clustered with R. leguminosarum USDA 2370T after MALDI-TOF MS cluster analysis (figure 5), only when the housekeeping genes were almost identical the score values were higher than 2 with respect to R. leguminosarum USDA 2370T (Table 2F). These results were congruent with those from recA and atpD gene analyses showing that, in spite of the complete identity of rrs gene, R. leguminosarum could contain several subspecies perfectly distinguishable by MALDI-TOF MS analysis as it has already been observed in other bacterial species [26], [40], [41].

Although housekeeping gene sequences present higher variability than those of rrs genes, the ITS fragment located between 16S and 23S gene in fast growing rhizobia is the most hypervariable chromosomic region and has been proposed as a tool for species differentiation [42]. However, MALDI-TOF MS showed that strains with housekeeping genes nearly identical but different ITS sequences belong to the same species. For example, the strains RPA12 and RPA02 shared only 73% identity in their ITS sequences with respect to R. giardinii H152T suggesting they can represent different species [43]. However, in agreement with rrs, recA and atpD gene analyses, MALDI-TOF MS showed that they belong to R. giardinii since they matched with the type strain of this species with score values higher than 2 (Table 2F).

The same was found for the genus Ensifer strains RTM17 and GVPV12 that matched with E. meliloti ATCC 9930T with score values higher than 2 (Table 2F) in spite of the differences in the ITS region (95% identity) [44] and in agreement with the results of the housekeeping gene analyses (figures 3 and 4).

Intraspecific variability in species of family Rhizobiaceae could be also due to the presence of large plasmids codifying for symbiotic or virulence factors. Nodulating species may contain different biovars that carry different nodC genes [21], [38], [44], [45] and pathogenic species contain strains that carry plasmids involved in tumour (pTi) or hairy roots induction (pRi) [46], [47]. Therefore we analysed strains with different combinations of chromosomal backgrounds and symbiotic or virulence plasmids by MALDI-TOF MS.

For example, within genus Rhizobium, R. leguminosarum contains three biovars: viciae, trifolii and phaseoli [31], [38], perfectly distinguishable on the basis of their nodC gene sequences (figure 7). However MALDI-TOF MS analysis showed that strains with housekeeping genes close to R. leguminosarum USDA 2370T (RVS11, RPVF18 and ATCC 14480) [29], [38], [39] matched with score values higher than 2 with this strain with independence to the biovar they belong to (figure 7). Likewise, the strains FL27 from biovar gallicum [45] and PhD12 from biovar phaseoli [21] carrying divergent nodC genes (figure 7) matched with R. gallicum R602spT with score values higher than 2 (Table 2F). The same was found in R. lusitanum whose strains P1-7T and P3-13 have phylogenetically distant nodC genes (figure 7) but they matched with a score value of 2.314 (Table 2F).

thumbnail
Figure 7. Neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree based on nodC gene sequences (about 860 nt) showing the position of representative strains from each biovar analysed in this study.

Bootstrap values calculated for 1000 replications are indicated. Bar, 5 nt substitution per 100 nt. Accesion numbers from Genbank are given in brackets.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020223.g007

In genus Ensifer, E. meliloti also contains different biovars with divergent nodC genes (figure 7). However, the strains RPA13 and RTM17 from biovar meliloti and the strain GVPV12 from biovar mediterranense [44] were matched with E. meliloti ATCC 9930T with score values higher than 2 by MALDI-TOF MS (Table 2F).

Conversely, strains from the same biovar but divergent housekeeping genes were perfectly distinguished by MALDI-TOF MS in genus Rhizobium. For example, the strain CVIII14 matched with a score value lower than 2 with R. leguminosarum USDA 2370T, although both strains belong to the biovar viciae (Table 2G). To this biovar also belongs R. pisi DSM 30132T that was correctly distinguished by MALDI-TOF MS from R. leguminosarum USDA 2370T (figure 7 and Table 2C). Moreover, strains CFN299 and CIAT 899T, whose rrs and housekeeping genes showed they belong to different species [48], matched with score values lower than 2 (Table 2F) in spite of the complete identity of their nodC genes (figure 7).

In genus Ensifer, E. meliloti RPA13 and RTM17 and E. medicae RMP01, RMP05, RPA08, RPA11 and RPA20 belong to the same biovar (meliloti) [49]. However, in agreement with rrs and housekeeping gene analyses (figures 2, 3 and 4), the strains of these both species were clearly distinguished by MALDI-TOF MS (Table 2F).

Finally, two species of genus Rhizobium, R. rhizogenes and R. radiobacter, contain non-pathogenic strains, tumourigenic strains and hairy roots inducing strains (Table 2F). In both cases their strains were correctly identified by MALDI-TOF MS in agreement with the rrs and housekeeping gene analyses (figures 2, 3 and 4) in spite of the plasmidic content. In this way the non-pathogenic strain K84 [46], the tumourigenic strain 163C and the root inducing strain IAM 13571, matched with R. rhizogenes ATCC 11325T, a root inducing strain, with high score values (2.185, 2.195 and 2.158, respectively). The tumourigenic strain ATCC 23308 (type strain of the former species A. tumefaciens) and the root inducing strain ATCC 13332 (erroneously named R. rhizogenes) also matched with the non-pathogenic strain R. radiobacter DSM 30147T with score values higher than 2 (Table 2F).

Conversely, although the pTi plasmids of the tumourigenic strains 163C and C58 are closely related [47], they belong to different species according to MALDI-TOF MS results (Table 2G) in agreement with the rrs and housekeeping gene analyses (figures 2, 3 and 4).

All these results showed that plasmids carried by fast growing rhizobial strains do not affect their identification by MALDI-TOF MS since strains of the same species carrying very different plasmids and strains from different species carrying similar plasmids were correctly identified by MALDI-TOF MS.

In conclusion, the results presented in this work clearly showed that MALDI-TOF MS is a reliable and rapid method for rhizobial identification comparable to housekeeping gene sequence analysis since it is able to discriminate between strains with identical rrs gene sequences but divergent recA and atpD. This feature represents important advantages based on the rapidity and cost per sample with respect to gene sequencing. With this methodology, if the databases include all rhizobial species described in each moment, it will be possible to identify all isolates belonging to species already described as well as the detection of new species. Therefore, MALDI-TOF MS open a new and very useful way for diversity and ecological studies applicable to analysis of large populations of isolates allowing the differentiation of strains, species and genera of fast-growing rhizobia with an effectiveness of 100% in the identification at species level.

Acknowledgments

We thank E. Martínez-Romero, P. van Berkum and N. Amarger for providing some of the strains used in this work. We also thank A. Peix for his valuable scientific comments.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: LF PFM EMM JMGB EV. Performed the experiments: LF FSJ PGF RR EV. Analyzed the data: LF FSJ EV. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: PGF EMM JMGB. Wrote the paper: LF EV.

References

  1. 1. Kuykendall LD (2005) Family I. Rhizobiaceae Conn 1938, 321AL. In: Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Stanley JT, editors. Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Vol. 2, part C. New York: Springer. pp. 324–361.
  2. 2. Lin DX, Wang ET, Tang H, Han TX, He YR, et al. (2008) Shinella kummerowiae sp. nov., a symbiotic bacterium isolated from root nodules of the herbal legume Kummerowia stipulacea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58: 1409–1413.
  3. 3. Young JM, Kuykendall LD, Martínez-Romero E, Kerr A, Sawada H (2001) A revision of Rhizobium Frank 1889, with an emended description of the genus, and the inclusion of all species of Agrobacterium Conn 1942 and Allorhizobium undicola de Lajudie et al. 1998 as new combinations: Rhizobium radiobacter, R. rhizogenes, R. rubi, R. undicola and R. vitis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51: 89–103.
  4. 4. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes (2008) The genus name Sinorhizobium Chen et al. 1988 is a later synonym of Ensifer Casida 1982 and is not conserved over the latter genus name, and the species name ‘Sinorhizobium adhaerens’ is not validly published. Opinion 84. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58: 1973.
  5. 5. Seng P, Drancourt M, Gouriet F, La Scola B, Fournier PE, et al. (2009) Ongoing revolution in bacteriology: routine identification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Clin Infect Dis 49: 543–551.
  6. 6. Bizzini A, Durussel C, Bille J, Greub G, Prod'hom G (2010) Performance of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry for the identification of bacterial strains routinely isolated in a clinical microbiology laboratory. J Clin Microbiol 48: 1549–1554.
  7. 7. Cherkaoui A, Hibbs J, Emonet S, Tangomo M, Girard M, et al. (2010) Comparison of two matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry methods with conventional phenotypic identification for routine identification of bacteria to the species level. J Clin Microbiol 48: 1169–1175.
  8. 8. Giebel R, Worden C, Rust SM, Kleinheinz GT, Robbins M, et al. (2010) Microbial fingerprinting using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) Applications and Challenges. Adv Appl Microbiol 71: 149–184.
  9. 9. Ferreira L, Sánchez-Juanes F, González-Avila M, Cembrero-Fuciños D, Herrero-Hernández A, et al. (2010) Direct identification of urinary tract pathogens from urine samples by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol 48: 2110–2115.
  10. 10. Ferreira L, Vega S, Sánchez-Juanes F, González M, Herrero A, et al. (2010) Identifying bacteria using a matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometer. Comparison with routine methods used in clinical microbiology laboratories. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 28: 492–497.
  11. 11. Ferreira L, Sánchez-Juanes F, Guerra IP, García García MI, Sánchez JE, et al. (2011) Microorganisms direct identification from blood culture by maldi-tof mass spectrometry. Clin Microbiol Infect 17: 546–551.
  12. 12. Ferreira L, Sánchez-Juanes F, Muñoz-Bellido JL, González-Buitrago JM (2010) Rapid method for direct identification of bacteria in urine and blood culture samples by MALDI-TOF MS: intact cell vs. extraction method. Clin Microbiol Infect. [Epub ahead of print].
  13. 13. Ferreira L, Vega-Castaño S, Sánchez-Juanes F, González-Cabrero S, Menegotto F, et al. (2010) Identification of Brucella by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry. Fast and Reliable Identification from Agar Plates and Blood Cultures. PLoS ONE 5: e14235.
  14. 14. Mellmann A, Cloud J, Maier T, Keckevoet U, Ramminger I, et al. (2008) Evaluation of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry in comparison to 16S rRNA gene sequencing for species identification of nonfermenting bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 46: 1946–1954.
  15. 15. Stevenson LG, Drake SK, Murray PR (2010) Rapid identification of bacteria in positive blood culture broths by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol 48: 444–447.
  16. 16. van Veen SQ, Claas EC, Kuijper EJ (2010) High-throughput identification of bacteria and yeast by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry in conventional medical microbiology laboratories. J Clin Microbiol 48: 900–907.
  17. 17. Beringer JE (1974) R factors transfer in Rhizobium leguminosarum. J Gen Microbiol 84: 188–198.
  18. 18. Vincent JM (1970) The cultivation, isolation and maintenance of rhizobia. In: Vincent JM, editor. A Manual for the Practical Study of Root-Nodule. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications. pp. 1–13.
  19. 19. Rivas R, García-Fraile P, Mateos PF, Martínez-Molina E, Velázquez E (2007) Characterization of xylanolytic bacteria present in the bract phyllosphere of the date palm Phoenix dactylifera. Lett Appl Microbiol 44: 181–187.
  20. 20. Gaunt MW, Turner SL, Rigottier-Gois L, Lloyd-Macgilp SA, Young JWP (2001) Phylogenies of atpD and recA support the small subunit rRNA-based classification of rhizobia. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51: 2037–2048.
  21. 21. Laguerre G, Nour SM, Macheret V, Sanjuan J, Drouin P, et al. (2001) Classification of rhizobia based on nodC and nifH gene analysis reveals a close phylogenetic relationship among Phaseolus vulgaris symbionts. Microbiology 147: 981–993.
  22. 22. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The clustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignement aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acid Res 24: 4876–4882.
  23. 23. Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16: 111–120.
  24. 24. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) A neighbour-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetics trees. Mol Biol Evol 44: 406–425.
  25. 25. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24: 1596–1599.
  26. 26. Seibold E, Maier T, Kostrzewa M, Zeman E, Splettstoesser W (2010) Identification of Francisella tularensis by whole-cell matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry: fast, reliable, robust, and cost-effective differentiation on species and subspecies levels. J Clin Microbiol 48: 1061–1069.
  27. 27. Barbuddhe SB, Maier T, Schwarz G, Kostrzewa M, Hof H, et al. (2008) Rapid identification and typing of listeria species by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. Appl Environ Microbiol 74: 5402–5407.
  28. 28. Sawada H, Ieki H, Oyaizu H, Matsumoto S (1993) Proposal for rejection of Agrobacterium tumefaciens and revised descriptions for the genus Agrobacterium and for Agrobacterium radiobacter and Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Int J Syst Bacteriol 43: 694–702.
  29. 29. Ramírez-Bahena MH, García-Fraile P, Peix A, Valverde A, Rivas R, et al. (2008) Revision of the taxonomic status of the species Rhizobium leguminosarum (Frank 1879) Frank 1889, R. phaseoli Dangeard 1926AL and R. trifolii Dangeard 1926AL. R. trifolii is a later synonym of R. leguminosarum. Reclassification of the strain Rhizobium leguminosarum DSM 30132T ( = NCIMB 11478T) into the new species Rhizobium pisi sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58: 2484–2490.
  30. 30. Kaur J, Verma M, Lal R (2010) Rhizobium rosettiformans sp. nov., isolated from hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) dump site in India, and reclassification of Blastobacter aggregatus Hirsch and Müller (1985) as Rhizobium aggregatum comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol.
  31. 31. Jordan DC (1984) Family III. Rhizobiaceae. In: Krieg NR, Holt JG, editors. Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Baltimore: The Williams and Wilkins Co. pp. 234–242.
  32. 32. Segovia L, Young JP, Martínez-Romero E (1993) Reclassification of American Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar phaseoli type I strains as Rhizobium etli sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 43: 374–377.
  33. 33. Martens M, Dawyndt P, Coopman R, Gillis M, de Vos P, et al. (2008) Advantages of multilocus sequence analysis for taxonomic studies: a case study using 10 housekeeping genes in the genus Ensifer (including former Sinorhizobium). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58: 200–214.
  34. 34. van Rhijn PJ, Feys B, Verreth C, Vanderleyden J (1993) Multiple copies of nodD in Rhizobium tropici CIAT899 and BR816. J Bacteriol 175: 438–447.
  35. 35. Snoeck C, Verreth C, Hernández-Lucas I, Martínez-Romero E, Vanderleyden J (2003) Identification of a third sulfate activation system in Sinorhizobium sp. strain BR816: the CysDN sulfate activation complex. Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 2006–2014.
  36. 36. Young JM (2003) The genus name Ensifer Casida 1982 takes priority over Sinorhizobium Chen et al. 1988, and Sinorhizobium morelense Wang et al. 2002 is a later synonym of Ensifer adhaerens Casida 1982. Is the combination “Sinorhizobium adhaerens” Casida 1982 Willems et al. 2003 legitimate? Request for an Opinion. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53: 2107–2110.
  37. 37. Murray PR (2010) Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry: usefulness for taxonomy and epidemiology. Clin Microbiol Infect 16: 1626–1630.
  38. 38. García-Fraile P, Mulas-García D, Peix A, Rivas R, González-Andrés F, et al. (2010) Phaseolus vulgaris is nodulated in northern Spain by Rhizobium leguminosarum strains harboring two nodC alleles present in American Rhizobium etli strains: biogeographical and evolutionary implications. Can J Microbiol 56: 657–666.
  39. 39. Alvarez-Martínez ER, Valverde A, Ramírez-Bahena MH, García-Fraile P, Tejedor C, et al. (2009) The analysis of core and symbiotic genes of rhizobia nodulating Vicia from different continents reveals their common phylogenetic origin and suggests the distribution of Rhizobium leguminosarum strains together with Vicia seeds. Arch Microbiol 191: 659–668.
  40. 40. Dieckmann R, Helmuth R, Erhard M, Malorny B (2008) Rapid classification and identification of Salmonellae at the species and subspecies levels by whole cell matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry. Appl Environ Microbiol 74: 7767–7778.
  41. 41. Tanigawa K, Kawabata H, Watanabe K (2010) Identification and typing of Lactococcus lactis by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of-flight mass spectrometry. Appl Environ Microbiol 76: 4055–4062.
  42. 42. Kwon SW, Park JY, Kim JS, Kang JW, Cho YH, et al. (2005) Phylogenetic analysis of the genera Bradyrhizobium, Mesorhizobium, Rhizobium and Sinorhizobium on the basis of 16S rRNA gene and internally transcribed spacer region sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55: 263–270.
  43. 43. Iglesias O, Rivas R, García-Fraile P, Abril A, Mateos PF, et al. (2007) Genetic characterization of fast-growing rhizobia able to nodulate Prosopis alba in North Spain. FEMS Microbiol Lett 277: 210–216.
  44. 44. Zurdo-Piñeiro JL, García-Fraile P, Rivas R, Peix A, León-Barrios M, et al. (2009) Rhizobia from Lanzarote, the Canary Islands, that nodulate Phaseolus vulgaris have characteristics in common with Sinorhizobium meliloti isolates from mainland Spain. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 2354–2359.
  45. 45. Amarger N, Macheret V, Laguerre G (1997) Rhizobium gallicum sp. nov. and Rhizobium giardinii sp. nov., from Phaseolus vulgaris nodules. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47: 996–1006.
  46. 46. Velázquez E, Palomo JL, Rivas R, Guerra H, Peix A, et al. (2010) Analysis of core genes supports the reclassification of strains Agrobacterium radiobacter K84 and Agrobacterium tumefaciens AKE10 into the species Rhizobium rhizogenes. Syst Appl Microbiol 33: 247–251.
  47. 47. Velázquez E, Peix A, Zurdo-Piñeiro JL, Palomo JL, Mateos PF, et al. (2005) The coexistence of symbiosis and pathogenicity-determining genes in Rhizobium rhizogenes strains enables them to induce nodules and tumors or hairy roots in plants. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 18: 1325–1332.
  48. 48. Valverde A, Igual JM, Peix A, Cervantes E, Velázquez E (2006) Rhizobium lusitanum sp. nov. a bacterium that nodulates Phaseolus vulgaris. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56: 2631–2637.
  49. 49. del Villar M, Rivas R, Peix A, Mateos PF, Martínez-Molina E, et al. (2008) Stable low molecular weight RNA profiling showed variations within Sinorhizobium meliloti and Sinorhizobium medicae nodulating different legumes from the alfalfa cross-inoculation group. FEMS Microbiol Lett 282: 273–281.
  50. 50. Casida LEJ (1982) Ensifer adhaerens gen nov. sp. nov.: a bacterial predator of bacteria in soil. Int J Syst Bacteriol 32: 339–345.
  51. 51. Toledo I, Lloret L, Martínez-Romero E (2003) Sinorhizobium americanus sp. nov., a new Sinorhizobium species nodulating native Acacia spp. in Mexico. Syst Appl Microbiol 26: 54–64.
  52. 52. Nick G, de Lajudie P, Eardly BD, Suomalainen S, Paulin L, et al. (1999) Sinorhizobium arboris sp. nov. and Sinorhizobium kostiense sp. nov., isolated from leguminous trees in Sudan and Kenya. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49: 1359–1368.
  53. 53. Scholla MH, Elkan GH (1984) Rhizobium fredii sp. nov., a Fast-Growing Species That Effectively Nodulates Soybeans. Int J Syst Bacteriol 34: 484–486.
  54. 54. Chen WX, Yan GH, Li JL (1988) Numerical taxonomy study of fast-growing soybean rhizobia and a proposal that Rhizobium fredii be assigned to Sinorhizobium gen. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 38: 392–397.
  55. 55. Merabet C, Martens M, Mahdhi M, Zakhia F, Sy A, et al. (2010) Multilocus sequence analysis of root nodule isolates from Lotus arabicus (Senegal), Lotus creticus, Argyrolobium uniflorum and Medicago sativa (Tunisia) and description of Ensifer numidicus sp. nov. and Ensifer garamanticus sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 60: 664–674.
  56. 56. Wei GH, Wang ET, Tan ZY, Zhu ME, Chen WX (2002) Rhizobium indigoferae sp. nov. and Sinorhizobium kummerowiae sp. nov., respectively isolated from Indigofera spp. and Kummerowia stipulacea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52: 2231–2239.
  57. 57. Rome S, Fernandez MP, Brunel B, Normand P, Cleyet-Marel JC (1996) Sinorhizobium medicae sp. nov., isolated from annual Medicago spp. Int J Syst Bacteriol 46: 972–980.
  58. 58. de Lajudie P, Willems A, Pot B, Dewettinck D, Maestrojuan G, et al. (1994) Polyphasic taxonomy of Rhizobia: emendation of the genus Sinorhizobium and description of Sinorhizobium meliloti comb. nov., Sinorhizobium saheli sp. nov., and Sinorhizobium teranga sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44: 715–733.
  59. 59. Wang ET, Tan ZY, Willems A, Fernández-López M, Reinhold-Hurek B, et al. (2002) Sinorhizobium morelense sp. nov., a Leucaena leucocephala-associated bacterium that is highly resistant to multiple antibiotics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52: 1687–1693.
  60. 60. Hirsch P, Müller M (1985) Title Blastobacter aggregatus sp. nov., Blastobacter capsulatus sp. nov., and Blastobacter denitrificans sp. nov., new budding bacteria from freshwater habitats. Syst Appl Microbiol 6: 281–286.
  61. 61. Berge O, Lodhi A, Brandelet G, Santaella C, Roncato MA, et al. (2009) Rhizobium alamii sp. nov., an exopolysaccharide-producing species isolated from legume and non-legume rhizospheres. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59: 367–372.
  62. 62. Lu YL, Chen WF, Han LL, Wang ET, Chen WX (2009) Rhizobium alkalisoli sp. nov., isolated from Caragana intermedia growing in saline-alkaline soils in the north of China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59: 3006–3011.
  63. 63. Zhang GX, Ren SZ, Xu MY, Zeng GQ, Luo HD, et al. (2010) Rhizobium borbori sp. nov., an aniline-degrading bacterium isolated from activated sludge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol.
  64. 64. García-Fraile P, Rivas R, Willems A, Peix A, Martens M, et al. (2007) Rhizobium cellulosilyticum sp. nov., isolated from sawdust of Populus alba. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57: 844–848.
  65. 65. Quan ZX, Bae HS, Baek JH, Chen WF, Im WT, et al. (2005) Rhizobium daejeonense sp. nov. isolated from a cyanide treatment bioreactor. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55: 2543–2549.
  66. 66. Tian CF, Wang ET, Wu LJ, Han TX, Chen WF, et al. (2009) Rhizobium fabae sp. nov., a bacterium that nodulates Vicia faba. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58: 2871–2875.
  67. 67. Lindström K (1989) Rhizobium galegae, a new species of legume root nodule bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 39: 365–367.
  68. 68. Chen WX, Tan ZY, Gao JL, Li Y, Wang ET (1997) Rhizobium hainanense sp. nov., isolated from tropical legumes. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47: 870–873.
  69. 69. Wang ET, van Berkum P, Beyene D, Sui XH, Dorado O, et al. (1998) Rhizobium huautlense sp. nov., a symbiont of Sesbania herbacea that has a close phylogenetic relationship with Rhizobium galegae. Int J Syst Bacteriol 48: 687–699.
  70. 70. Bouzar H, Jones JB (2001) Agrobacterium larrymoorei sp. nov., a pathogen isolated from aerial tumours of Ficus benjamina. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51: 1023–1026.
  71. 71. Young JM (2004) Renaming of Agrobacterium larrymoorei Bouzar and Jones 2001 as Rhizobium larrymoorei (Bouzar and Jones 2001) comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54: 149.
  72. 72. Wei GH, Tan ZY, Zhu ME, Wang ET, Han SZ, et al. (2003) Characterization of rhizobia isolated from legume species within the genera Astragalus and Lespedeza grown in the Loess Plateau of China and description of Rhizobium loessense sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53: 1575–1583.
  73. 73. Lin DX, Chen WF, Wang FQ, Hu D, Wang ET, et al. (2009) Rhizobium mesosinicum sp. nov., isolated from root nodules of three different legumes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59: 1919–1923.
  74. 74. Gu CT, Wang ET, Tian CF, Han TX, Chen WF, et al. (2008) Rhizobium miluonense sp. nov., a symbiotic bacterium isolated from Lespedeza root nodules. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58: 1364–1368.
  75. 75. van Berkum P, Beyene D, Bao G, Campbell TA, Eardly BD (1998) Rhizobium mongolense sp. nov. is one of three rhizobial genotypes identified which nodulate and form nitrogen-fixing symbioses with Medicago ruthenica [(L.) Ledebour]. Int J Syst Bacteriol 48: 13–22.
  76. 76. Han TX, Wang ET, Wu LJ, Chen WF, Gu JG, et al. (2008) Rhizobium multihospitium sp. nov., isolated from multiple legume species native of Xinjiang, China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58: 1693–1699.
  77. 77. Peng G, Yuan Q, Li H, Zhang W, Tan Z (2008) Rhizobium oryzae sp. nov., isolated from the wild rice Oryza alta. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58: 2158–2163.
  78. 78. Hildebrand EM (1940) Cane gall of brambles caused by Phytomonas n. sp. J Agric Res 61: 685–696.
  79. 79. Hunter WJ, Kuykendall LD, Manter DK (2007) Rhizobium selenireducens sp. nov.: A Selenite-Reducing alpha-Proteobacteria Isolated From a Bioreactor. Curr Microbiol 55: 455–460.
  80. 80. Squartini A, Struffi P, Döring H, Selenska-Pobell S, Tola E, et al. (2002) Rhizobium sullae sp. nov. (formerly ‘Rhizobium hedysari’), the root-nodule microsymbiont of Hedysarum coronarium L. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52: 1267–1276.
  81. 81. Hou BC, Wang ET, Li Y, Jia RZ, Chen WF, et al. (2009) Rhizobium tibeticum sp. nov., a symbiotic bacterium isolated from Trigonella archiducis-nicolai (Sirj.) Vassilcz. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59: 3051–3057.
  82. 82. Martínez-Romero E, Segovia L, Mercante FM, Franco AA, Graham P, et al. (1991) Rhizobium tropici, a novel species nodulating Phaseolus vulgaris L. beans and Leucaena sp. trees. Int J Syst Bacteriol 41: 417–426.
  83. 83. Zhang RJ, Hou BC, Wang ET, Li Y Jr, Zhang XX, et al. (2010) Rhizobium tubonense sp. nov., a symbiotic bacterium isolated from root nodules of Oxytropis glabra grown in Tibet, China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol.
  84. 84. de Lajudie P, Laurent-Fulele E, Willems A, Torck U, Coopman R, et al. (1992) Allorhizobium undicola gen. nov., sp. nov., nitrogen-fixing bacteria that efficiently nodulate Neptunia natans in Senegal. Int J Syst Bacteriol 42: 93–96.
  85. 85. Ophel K, Kerr A (1990) Agrobacterium vitis sp. nov. for Strains of Agrobacterium biovar 3 from Grapevines. Int J Syst Bacteriol 40: 236–241.
  86. 86. Ren DW, Chen WF, Sui XH, Wang ET, Chen WX (2010) Rhizobium vignae sp. nov., a symbiotic bacterium isolated from multiple legume species grown in China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol.
  87. 87. Tan ZY, Kan F, Peng GX, Wang ET, Reinhold-Hurek B, et al. (2001) Rhizobium yanglingense sp. nov., isolated from arid and semi-arid regions in China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51: 909–914.
  88. 88. An DS, Im WT, Yang HC, Lee ST (2006) Shinella granuli gen. nov., sp. nov., and proposal of the reclassification of Zoogloea ramigera ATCC 19623 as Shinella zoogloeoides sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56: 443–448.
  89. 89. Vaz-Moreira I, Faria C, Lopes AR, Svensson LA, Moore ERB, et al. (2010) Shinella fusca sp. nov., isolated from domestic waste compost. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 60: 144–148.
  90. 90. Matsui T, Shinzato N, Tamaki H, Muramatsu M, Hanada S (2009) Shinella yambaruensis sp. nov., a 3-methyl-sulfolane-assimilating bacterium isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59: 536–539.
  91. 91. Crabtree K, McCoy E (1967) Zoogloea ramigera Itzigsohn, identification and description. Int J Syst Bacteriol 17: 1–10.
  92. 92. Peng GX, Tan ZY, Wang ET, Reinhold-Hurek B, Chen WF, et al. (2002) Identification of isolates from soybean nodules in Xinjiang Region as Sinorhizobium xinjiangense and genetic differentiation of S. xinjiangense from Sinorhizobium fredii. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52: 457–462.
  93. 93. Velázquez E, Palomo JL, Lastra B, Mateos P, García-Benavides P, et al. (2001) Rapid identification of Agrobacterium species by staircase electrophoresis of low molecular weight RNA profiles. Eur J Plant Pathol 107: 931–938.
  94. 94. Ramírez-Bahena MH, Velázquez E, Fernández-Santos F, Peix A, Martínez-Molina E, et al. (2009) Phenotypic, genotypic and symbiotic diversity in strains nodulating clover in different soils in Spain. Can J Microbiol 55: 1207–1216.
  95. 95. Goodner B, Hinkle G, Gattung S, Miller N, Blanchard M, et al. (2001) Genome sequence of the plant pathogen and biotechnology agent Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58. Science 294: 2323–2328.