Figures
Abstract
To investigate the efficacy of fosfomycin against extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) producing Escherichia coli in Taiwan and the resistance mechanisms and characterization of human and pig isolates, we analyzed 145 ESBL-producing isolates collected from two hospitals (n = 123) and five farms (n = 22) in Taiwan from February to May, 2013. Antimicrobial susceptibilities were determined. Clonal relatedness was determined by PFGE and multi-locus sequence typing. ESBLs, ampC, and fosfomycin resistant genes were detected by PCR, and their flanking regions were determined by PCR mapping and sequencing. The fosfomycin resistant mechanisms, including modification of the antibiotic target (MurA), functionless transporters (GlpT and UhpT) and their regulating genes such as uhpA, cyaA, and ptsI, and antibiotic inactivation by enzymes (FosA and FosC), were examined. The size and replicon type of plasmids carrying fosfomycin resistant genes were analyzed. Our results revealed the susceptibility rates of fosfomycin were 94% for human ESBL-producing E. coli isolates and 77% for pig isolates. The PFGE analysis revealed 79 pulsotypes. No pulsotype was found existing in both human and pig isolates. Three pulsotypes were distributed among isolates from two hospitals. ISEcp1 carrying blaCTX-M-group 9 was the predominant transposable elements of the ESBL genes. Among the thirteen fosfomycin resistant isolates, functionless transporters were identified in 9 isolates. Three isolates contained novel amino acid substitutions (Asn67Ile, Phe151Ser and Trp164Ser, Val146Ala and His159Tyr, respectively) in MurA (the target of fosfomycin). Four isolates had fosfomycin modified enzyme (fosA3) in their plasmids. The fosA3 gene was harboured in an IncN-type plasmid (101 kbp) in the three pig isolates and an IncB/O-type plasmid (113 kbp) in the human isolate. In conclusion, we identified that 6% and 23% of the ESBL-producing E. coli from human and pigs were resistant to fosfomycin, respectively, in Taiwan. No clonal spread was found between human and pig isolates. Functionless transporters were the major cause of fosfomycin resistance, and the fosA3-transferring plasmid between isolates warrants further monitoring.
Citation: Tseng S-P, Wang S-F, Kuo C-Y, Huang J-W, Hung W-C, Ke G-M, et al. (2015) Characterization of Fosfomycin Resistant Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli Isolates from Human and Pig in Taiwan. PLoS ONE 10(8): e0135864. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135864
Editor: Patrick Butaye, Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine, SAINT KITTS AND NEVIS
Received: April 14, 2015; Accepted: July 27, 2015; Published: August 17, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Tseng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This work was supported by Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 103-2320-B-037-023) and NSYSU-KMU Joint Research Project (NSYSUKMU103-I005) and Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Taiwan. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The emerging problem of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) producing Enterobacteriaceae has been reported worldwide [1,2]. Infections of ESBLs-producing Enterobacteriaceae are difficult to treat because many of the commonly used antibiotics (β-lactams) will not work against these isolates. Falagas et al. reported that fosfomycin could be a solution to this problem; the susceptibility to fosfomycin was 96.8% (1604/1657) in ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and 81.3% (608/748) in Klebsiella pneumoniae in a systemic review [3]. In addition, oral fosfomycin use is effective against uncomplicated urinary tract infections caused by ESBL-producing E. coli, Proteus mirabilis, K. pneumoniae and Staphylococcus saprophyticus [3–6].
The fosfomycin resistance mechanisms that have been reported include the modification of the antibiotic target (MurA), functionless transporters (GlpT and UhpT transporters and their regulating genes such as uhpA, cyaA, and ptsI) and antibiotic inactivation (FosA and FosC) in E. coli [7]. Due to the fosfomycin inactivation genes (fosA3 and fosC) that were found in the conjugative plasmid or transposon element, transferable fosA3 and fosC genes have become a serious problem in East Asia [8–14]. Recent studies have focused on the disseminative fosfomycin resistant genes. These reports revealed fosA3 genes were flanked by IS26 and were localized on conjugative plasmids for human isolates in Japan [13,14], Korea [12], and another fosA variant (fosKP96) was found in Hong Kong [8], while some studies have focused on livestock or animal isolates from different regions of China [9–11]. In this study, we aimed to identify fosfomycin resistance and its underlying mechanisms and characterization of ESBL-producing E. coli isolates from human and pig sources in Taiwan.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial isolates
A total of 145 ESBL-producing isolates of E. coli were collected from 2 hospitals and 5 local farms in Taiwan during February-May 2013. Ninety-five isolates were collected from the Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital (KMUH), and the sources included urine (n = 69), blood (n = 7), abscess (n = 8), and others (n = 11). Twenty-eight isolates were collected from the Pingtung Hospital (PTH), and the sources included urine (n = 18), blood (n = 6), pus (n = 3), and sputum (n = 1). Twenty-two pig isolates were all collected from fecal specimens from pigs. The sizes of farms were ranged from 2000 to10000 feeder pigs (Landrace and American Yorkshire pigs). The body weight and age ranged from 7 to 25 Kg and 28 Days to 8 weeks, respectively. All pig isolates were belonging to fecal sample isolated from anal swabs. The distances from hospitals to pig farms were about 20 kilometers.We analysed the bacterial isolates only and the categories of human specimen information or the private information of patient were not included in the study.
Ethics statement
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan (KMUH-IRB-860-911). The study subjects were bacterial isolates and the written consent given by the patients was waived by the approving IRB. Before collecting fecal specimens from pigs on this study, we contacted the farm owners and obtained their permission. No specific permits were required for the described field studies and the locations where we sampled are not privately-owned or protected in any way. The field studies did not involve endangered or protected species.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing
The antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by a standard agar dilution method according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [15]. Three antimicrobial agents: fosfomycin, cefotaxime, and meropenem were tested in all isolates. The phenotypic detection of ESBLs was conducted by Vitek 2 system (bioMérieux Inc., Durham, NC). The susceptibilities of 4 fosA3-habouring isolates and their transformants were tested for the following antimicrobial agents including ampicillin, amikacin, tetracycline, levofloxacin, chloramphenicol, fosfomycin, cefotaxime, and meropenem.
Bacterial strain typing (PFGE and MLST)
The PFGE typing of XbaI (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA)-digested DNA was prepared in accordance with previously described methods [16]. Dice similarity indices were employed to construct the dendrogram of the pulsotype relationships through the unweighted pair group method using arithmetic averages (UPGMA) with BioNumerics software version 6.5 (Applied Maths). The pulsotypes were assigned to the same clusters if they exhibited 80% similarity in the dendrogram. The MLST scheme of E. coli uses internal fragments from seven housekeeping genes: adk (adenylate kinase), fumC (fumarate hydratase), gyrB (DNA gyrase), icd (isocitrate/isopropylmalate dehydrogenase), mdh (malate dehydrogenase), purA (adenylosuccinate dehydrogenase), and recA (ATP/GTP binding motif). The primers were derived from the E. coli MLST database (http://mlst.ucc.ie/mlst/dbs/Ecoli). The PCR amplification and sequencing were performed following this website’s suggested protocols. The four fosA3-habouring isolates were analyzed by MLST.
Detection of antimicrobial resistance genes
The plasmid DNA was extracted using the QIAGEN Plasmid Mini Kit. For the detection of the ESBLs (blaSHV, blaTEM, blaCTX-M-group 1, blaCTX-M-group 2, and blaCTX-M-group 9) and plasmid-mediated AmpC genes blaDHA, and blaCMY and the fosfomycin resistance genes (fosA, fosA3, fosC2), the primer sets from previous reports were used [10,17]. The purified PCR amplicons of blaTEM were sequenced by the dideoxy chain-termination method with an automated DNA Sequencer (Perkin-Elmer ABI3700), and the nucleotide sequences were analyzed with the BLAST sequence alignment database (National Center for Biotechnology Information).
Analysis of the transposable elements upstream of the bla genes
To investigate the different kinds of transposable elements surrounding the blaSHV, blaCTX and blaTEM genes, the linkage of blaSHV with recF and IS26 was determined using specific primers (RECF-F and SHV-F-I; IS26-FCJ and SHV-F-I) [18]. The linkage of blaTEM with tnpA and IS26 was determined using specific primers (RH401 and RH410; RH1270 and RH606) [19]. The linkage of blaCTX-M-group 1 with ISEcp1 and IS26 was determined using specific primers (ISEcpUP and CTX-M1RCJ; IS26-FCJ and CTX-M1RCJ) [18]. The linkage of blaCTX-M-group 9 with ISEcp1 was determined using specific primers (ISEcpUP and CTX-M-9-R1) [18]. All the PCR amplicons were sequenced, and the sequence was compared in the GenBank nucleotide database.
Nucleotide sequencing of fosA3 and the flanking regions
To determine the genetic environment of fosA3, PCR mapping and an LA PCR in vitro cloning kit (Takara Shuzo Co. Ltd., Japan) were used. The flanking regions between IS26 and fosA3 were identified by PCR amplicons and sequencing. The primers used were those from previous studies [9].
Conjugation and transformation assays
The conjugation and electotransformation assays were performed as previous studies [12]. The conjugation experiments were conducted according to the broth mating method using E. coli J53 as the recipient. The transconjugants were selected on LB agar plates supplemented with sodium azide (150 μg/ml), fosfomycin (40 μg/ml), and glucose-6-phosphate (G6P) (25 μg/ml). If the conjugation assay failed, an electotransformation assay using E. coli DH5α as the recipient was conducted. The transconjugants were selected on LB agar plates supplemented with fosfomycin (40 μg/ml) and G6P (25 μg/ml).
Plasmid analysis and Southern blot hybridization
The plasmid incompatibility group analyses were determined according to the PCR-based replicon-typing method [20]. The size estimation of the plasmids was determined by an S1-nuclease PFGE analysis and calculated with the BioNumerics GelCompar software package (Version 5.0, Applied Mathematics, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium) as previously described [17]. The Lambda Ladder PFG marker (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) was used as a molecular size marker. The plasmid PFGE gel was then subjected to Southern blotting and hybridized with a DIG (digoxigenin)-labeled fosA3 and CTX-M-group 9 specific probe. The primer sets from previous reports were used [10,17]. The hybridization assay was performed as described previously [17].
Activity of GlpT and UhpT transpoters
The usage of carbohydrates which indicated the activity of GlpT and UhpT transpoters was performed as previous studies [21,22]. Briefly, 0.2% (w/v) G6P or sn-glycerol 3-phosphate (G3P) as the sole carbon source was supplied in M9 minimal medium agar. The overnight bacterial suspension was washed with an equivalent volume of saline and optimal McFarland No. 4. The bacterial suspensions (200 μl) were plated on M9 minimal medium agar supplying different sole carbohydrates at 37°C for 48 h. The negative phenotype was defined as a lack of colonies forming on the plate.
Sequencing analysis of fosfomycin resistance related chromosomal genes
PCR and sequencing were performed to amplify the entire sequences of the 6 genes including murA, glpT, uhpT, uhpA, ptsI, and cyaA. The primers used were those from a previous study [22]. The variations of amino acids were compared to the reference strain E.coli ATCC 25922.
Cloning overexpression of MurA from the different amino acid variations
The murA gene (ATCC25922, A12, A19, and K55) was amplified by PCR using a cloning primer, as previously described [22]. The PCR products were cloned into a T & A (Yeastern Biotech, Taiwan) plasmid and were transformed into E. coli DH5α. The insertion of the murA gene was verified by nucleotide sequence. To determine the fosfomycin susceptibility of the overexpressing murA in E. coli, 25 μg/ml G6P and 1 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) were added to Muller-Hinton agar with various concentrations of fosfomycin (0–1024 μg/ml).
Results
Antimicrobial susceptibility tests and molecular typing
The susceptibility rates for fosfomycin were 94% (90/95), 89% (25/28), and 77% (17/22) in KMUH, PTH and pig ESBL-producing E. coli isolates, respectively. The PFGE analysis revealed 79 pulsotypes and 4 non-typable isolates, indicating the genetic diversity of these isolates (Fig 1). Three pulsotypes appeared in both hospitals, including pulsotype XXIX (n = 5, 4 from KMUH and 1 from PTH), XXXIV (n = 8, 2 from KMUH and 6 from PTH) and XLIV (n = 25, 21 from KMUH and 4 from PTH). CTX-M-group 1 was dominant ESBL in Pulsotype XXIX and XXXIV whereas CTX-M-group 9 was dominant ESBL in puslotype XLIX, respectively. No identical puslotypes were found in both human and pig isolates; diversity of puslotypes were found in pig isolates. This finding indicates that human ESBL-producing E. coli has no relationship with pig isolates.
Pulsotypes were assigned to the same clusters if they exhibited 80% similarity in the dendrogram. Three major clusters (XXIX, XXXIV, and XLIV) were found in two hospitals.
Detection of β-lactamases and their linkage to transposable elements
Among the 95 isolates in KMUH, the most frequent β-lactamases were CTX-M-group 9 (n = 36; 37%), followed by TEM (n = 24; 25%), CMY-2 (n = 21; 22%), and the CTX-M-group 1 (n = 18; 18%) (Table 1). Similarly, for the 28 isolates from PTH, the CTX-M-group 1 was the most common type (n = 10; 35%), followed by TEM (n = 9; 32%), CMY-2 (n = 9; 32%), and CTX-M-group 9 (n = 7; 25%). For the pig isolates, the CTX-M-group 9 gene was the dominant type (n = 14; 63%), followed by TEM (n = 12; 54%), the CTX-M-group 1 (n = 6; 27%), and CMY-2 (n = 5; 22%). These data found that the CTX-M-group 1, the CTX-M-group 9 and CMY-2 were the most frequent ESBLs in Taiwan. Besides, it should be noted that all TEM were TEM-1 which was not ESBL in this study.
Transposable elements were usually found in the upstream region of ESBLs and could be related to horizontal genetic transferring [18,19]. PCR mapping and sequencing revealed different transposable elements related to ESBLs (S1 Fig). In the upstream region of SHV, two types were found: recF- kdpC- blaSHV (SHVType A) and IS26- 73 bp spacer sequence- blaSHV (SHVType B). ISEcp1 was found upstream of the CTX-M-group 1 gene, which was the dominant type (83% of the KMUH isolates, 90% of the PTH isolates, and 50% of the pig isolates) (S1 Table). Two different lengths of spacer regions (42 bp in CTX-M-G9Type A and 127 bp in CTX-M-G9Type B) were found between ISEcp1 and blaCTX-M-group 9. CTX-M-G9Type A was the predominant type in the two hospitals and in the pig isolates.
Characteristics of fosfomycin-resistant E. coli isolates
Among the 145 ESBL-producing E. coli isolates, 13 isolates (9.0%) were resistant to fosfomycin (Table 2). Four and five isolates grew on minimal medium agar supplemented with G3P and G6P, respectively (Table 2). To determine the resistance mechanism, nucleotide sequences of the genes glpT, uhpT, uhpA, ptsI and cyaA were tested in all the resistant isolates. Among the 9 isolates that did not grow on G3P, four isolates (A19, K66, K116 and P12) revealed amino acid substitutions in the glpT gene. The A19 and K66 isolates were identified to have single amino acid substitutions at codons 174 (Leu174Val) and 209 (Arg209His), respectively. K66 isolate also carried fosA3 gene that causes fosfomycin resistance. The K116 isolate had 2 amino acid changes (Gly142Cys and Phe176Ser), and the P12 isolate had 3 amino acid changes (Arg50Cys, Ala156Val, and Val149Met). Two isolates (K55 and K101) which did not grow on G3P did not have amino acid changes in the glpT gene but possessed amino acid substitutions in the upstream regulator ptsI (Thr215Ala and Gly227Arg in K55 and Ala104Thr in K101). Three isolates (A10, A11, and A12) did not have amino acid changes in the glpT and ptsI genes; however, these isolates contained the fosA3 gene that results in fosfomycin resistance.
Among the 8 isolates that did not grow on G6P, 6 isolates (K55, K72, K101, K116, P16 and P32) revealed amino acid substitutions in the uhpT gene (Table 2). The K55, K101 and K116 isolates were identified to have single amino acid substitutions at codons 85 (Val85Leu), 109 (Cys109Trp) and 18 (Val18Leu), respectively. Multiple amino acid substitutions were found in K72 (Ser26Arg, His50Pro and Ile149Met), P16 (Lys132Glu, Ile149Met and Tyr165His), and P32 (Trp44Cys and Gly134Asp). Although A5 and A19 did not grow on G6P and did not have any amino acid changes in the uhpT gene, the upstream regulator uhpA contained two amino acid substitutions (Pro160Leu and Ala167Val in A5; Gln32His and Ala39Val in A19).
Characterization of 4 fosA3-habouring isolates
For the four fosA3-habouring isolates (A10, A11, A12, and K66), the surrounding region of fosA3 was flanked by two IS26 elements (type A; Fig 2). Three isolates (A10 from farm A, A12 from farm C, and K66 from KMUH) showed a 100% identity to the GenBank accession number AB522970, which contained fosA3, orf1, orf2 and truncated orf3 (type A; Fig 2) [14]. The other isolate (A11 from farm A) had an ISAplI inserting a similar structure between IS26 and fosA3 (type B; Fig 2) (GenBank accession number was KT199757). The PFGE and MLST typing revealed that 3 different pig isolates (pulsotype XXXIV and ST744) were the same genotype, which differed from the human isolate (pulsotype XXX and ST2310) (Table 3). The plasmid profiles of the pig isolates were similar (146, 101, and 85 kbp) whereas the human isolate had 2 different sized plasmids (184 and 113 kbp). The locations of the fosA3 and blaCTX-M-group 9 genes were analyzed by S1 nuclease-PFGE and hybridization with specific probes for the fosA3 and blaCTX-M-group 9 genes, respectively. The fosA3 gene was hybridized with a 101 kbp IncN-type plasmid in the pig isolates and a 113 kb IncB/O-type plasmid in the human isolate (Fig 3B and Table 3). In addition, the 101 kbp IncN-type plasmid was hybridized with the blaCTX-M-group 9 probe in the pig isolates (Fig 3C), indicating the co-localization of the fosA3 and blaCTX-M-group 9 genes in the pig isolates. Although, IncB/O-type plasmid contained fosA3 without blaCTX-M-group 9 gene, blaCMY-2 was found in transformant of IncB/O-type plasmid (K66) by PCR detection. The antibiotic susceptibility tests revealed that these 4 clinical isolates were resistant to ampicillin, amikacin, tetracycline, levofloxacin, chloramphenicol, fosfomycin, and cefotaxime without meropenem, while the transformants were only resistant to ampicillin, cefotaxime and fosfomycin.
Genes are shown as arrows with the direction of transcription indicated by the arrowheads.
(A) S1-nuclease digested plasmid profiles separated by PFGE. (B) S1-nuclease digested plasmid profiles hybridized with a fosA3 probe. The arrows showed the location of fosA3 genes. (C) S1-nuclease digested plasmid profiles hybridized with a blaCTX-M-group 9 probe. The arrows showed the location of blaCTX-M-group 9 genes. Lane M, MidRange II PFG Marker; lane1, A10; lane 2, A11; lane 3, A12 and lane 4, K66.
Modification of the fosfomycin target MurA
Amino acid substitutions of MurA were found in two pig isolates: A12 (Asn67Ile), A19 (Phe151Ser and Trp164Ser), and one hospital isolate: K55 (Val146Ala and His159Tyr), respectively. To test the correlation between these amino acid substitutions and fosfomycin resistance, wild type and mutant MurA were constructed and expressed in E. coli DH5α (Table 4). The variations of MurA were shown to cause a 16-fold increase of the fosfomycin MIC compared to the wild-type MurA (Table 4). These results indicate that the amino acid substitutions in MurA were related to fosfomycin resistance.
Discussion
To our knowledge, this study was the first to investigate fosfomycin resistance of both human and pig ESBL-producing E. coli isolates in Taiwan. Thirteen (9%) ESBL-producing E. coli isolates were resistant to fosfomycin in the study. The resistant rate to fosfomycin was lower in human isolates (6% in KMUH and 11% in PTH) than the resistance rate in pig isolates (22%). Among the only two studies on fosfomycin susceptibility from human isolates in Taiwan, one study revealed that 95.5% ESBL-producing E. coli isolates were susceptible to fosfomycin [23] and the other revealed that 100% E. coli isolates were susceptible to fosfomycin [24]. According to the two reports, fosfomycin is a therapeutic choice for treating ESBL-producing E. coli infection in Taiwan. We identified a relatively high fosfomycin resistant rate for pig ESBL-producing E. coli isolates. Our results suggested antibiotic selection pressure might exist in pig farms. The molecular epidemiology analysis by the PFGE found no clonal associations between human and pig isolates. Clonal spread of three pulsotypes might occur in two hospitals.
In this study, four isolates contained the fosA3 gene in a plasmid, and nine isolates displayed the mutation in murA, glpT, uhpT, uhpA, ptsI, and cyaA genes. Nine and eight isolates did not grow on minimal medium agar supplemented with G3P and G6P, respectively. This result indicated that the UhpT and/or GlpT transporter may be defective in these isolates. Although, amino acids substitutions in transporters or regulated genes were not evidenced by in vitro experiments in this study, functionless transporters (GlpT or UhpT) could be detected by minimal medium agar with G3P or G6P, as the previously reported [21,22]. Takahata et al. reported 6 fosfomycin resistant clinical E. coli isolates that harbored different fosfomycin-related gene mutations [22]. The glpT gene mutation (4 isolates) and the loss of the entire uhpT gene (2 isolates) decreased the fosfomycin uptake into the bacterial cells, leading to fosfomycin resistance. The other study by Nilsson et al. investigated fosfomycin resistance mechanisms in 13 clinical E. coli isolates [21]. A mutation in the cyaA (5 isolates) and ptsI (2 isolates) genes impaired both glpT and uhpT expression. In our study, three and one isolates carried mutations in their uhpT and glpT genes, respectively. MurA has been reported to confer clinical fosfomycin resistance at a low fitness cost [25]. The other study described two isolates that contained the murA mutation (Asp369Asn or Leu370Ile), leading to fosfomycin resistance [22]. Our results revealed new variations (Asn67Ile, Phe151Ser and Trp164Ser, Val146Ala and His159Tyr, respectively) in MurA (Table 4) that might affect fosfomycin binding to the Cys-115 residue (active site) or the three conserved positively charged residues (Lys22, Arg120 and Arg397) in MurA [26].
In East Asia, most countries have found plasmid-mediated fosA3 in ESBL-producing E. coli isolates [8,9,11–13]. Ho et al. found fosA3 and blaCTX-M genes were coharboured on conjugative plasmids with F2:A-:B- (n = 2), N (n = 1), F-:A-:B1 and N (n = 1) and untypable (n = 2) replicons in Hong Kong [8]. Hou et al. reported fosA3 and blaCTX-M genes were coharboured on conjugative plasmids with F33:A-:B- (n = 2), F2:A-:B- (n = 1), and N (n = 4) in China [11]. Lee et al. reported fosA3 and blaCTX-M genes were coharboured on conjugative plasmids with FII (n = 3), and N (n = 1) in Koera [12]. SaTo et al. reported fosA3 and blaCTX-M genes were coharboured on conjugative plasmids with I1 (n = 2), N (n = 1) and FII (n = 2) in Japan [13]. We reported the first detection of E. coli isolates containing an IncN-type plasmid (101 kbp) carrying fosA3 and blaCTX-M-G9 genes from pig feces and an IncB/O-type plasmid (113 kbp) carrying fosA3 from a human urine specimen in Taiwan (Table 3). In literature, the IncN-type plasmid carries different important resistance determinants such as CTX-M, VIM-1, KPC-2 and NDM-1 [27,28]. The other IncB/O-type plasmid (113 kbp) that contains fosA3 and blaCMY-2 from the human urine specimen was similar to the pX6SA plasmid (120 kbp) harboring IncB/O replicon and fosA3, which was reported from cattle fecal specimens in Hong Kong [9].
Research regarding the transposable elements surrounding ESBLs was limited in Taiwan [29,30]. The detection of ESBLs and the linkage of transposable elements were investigated in this study. The most common ESBLs were CTX-M-group 1, CTX-M-group 9 and CMY-2 in E. coli in Taiwan. Our results revealed the same transposable elements surrounding ESBLs in human and pig isolates that indicate that ESBLs could be transferred via a plasmid or transposon between human and pig hosts. SHV was predominant in ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae isolates in Taiwan [30] whereas a low percentage (5.5%) of SHV was found in the ESBL-producing E. coli isolates in this study (Table 2). IS26 was related to disseminated antibiotic resistance genes worldwide[31, 32]. In this study, IS26, which was located upstream of blaSHV, and fosA3, was associated with the dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes in Taiwan (S1 Fig and Fig 2). ISEcp1 was mostly found upstream of blaCTX-M in Spanish, French, Indian and Turkish [18,33,34]. Our study identified the role of ISEcp1 in Taiwan that supported its role for global blaCTX-M dissemination. Besides, ISEcp1 was upstream of the blaCTX-M-group 1 and blaCTX-M-group 9 genes with different spacer regions, (S1 Fig). Our previous study demonstrated that blaCTX-M expression was correlated with different spacer sequences (42 and 127 bp), which affected blaCTX-M expression [35]. In this study, the 42 bp spacer region was found predominant (S1 Table).
It should be noted that the number of pig isolates was small in this study. The prevalence of resistance to fosfomycin required further studies with a larger isolate number. Due to the limited sample size, the clonal relationship between human and pig isolates required further studies with a larger isolate number.
In conclusion, the susceptibility rates of fosfomycin were different between human and pig ESBL-producing E. coli isolates. The major resistance mechanism of fosfomycin was amino acid variation in chromosomally encoded fosfomycin-related genes such as the antibiotic target gene (murA), GlpT and UhpT transporters (glpT and uhpT) and regulating genes (uhpA, cyaA, and ptsI). The IncN-type plasmid carrying fosA3 and blaCTX-M-group 9 in pig isolates is of concern. In addition, the horizontal fosA3-transferring via the IS26 mobile element between human and pig isolates might exist in Taiwan and warrant further monitoring.
Supporting Information
S1 Fig. Representation of the transposable elements surrounding blaCTX-M and blaSHV genes.
The transcriptional mobile elements and space region were detected by PCR and sequencing.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135864.s001
(TIFF)
S1 Table. ESBLs and linkage of transposable elements in E. coli isolates.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135864.s002
(DOCX)
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: SPT PLL. Performed the experiments: CYK JWH GMK. Analyzed the data: SFW WCH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: PLL. Wrote the paper: SPT PLL.
References
- 1. Pitout JD, Laupland KB (2008) Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: an emerging public-health concern. Lancet Infect Dis 8: 159–166. pmid:18291338
- 2. Zahar JR, Lortholary O, Martin C, Potel G, Plesiat P, Nordmann P. (2009) Addressing the challenge of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 10: 172–180. pmid:19197795
- 3. Falagas ME, Kastoris AC, Kapaskelis AM, Karageorgopoulos DE (2010) Fosfomycin for the treatment of multidrug-resistant, including extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing, Enterobacteriaceae infections: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis 10: 43–50. pmid:20129148
- 4. Keating GM (2013) Fosfomycin trometamol: a review of its use as a single-dose oral treatment for patients with acute lower urinary tract infections and pregnant women with asymptomatic bacteriuria. Drugs 73: 1951–1966. pmid:24202878
- 5. Gutierrez L, Ocampo L, Rosario C, Sumano H (2010) Pharmacokinetics of disodium fosfomycin in broilers and dose strategies to comply with its pharmacodynamics versus Escherichia coli. Poult Sci 89: 2106–2115. pmid:20852101
- 6. Soraci AL, Perez DS, Martinez G, Dieguez S, Tapia MO, Amanto F, et al. (2011) Disodium-fosfomycin pharmacokinetics and bioavailability in post weaning piglets. Res Vet Sci 90: 498–502. pmid:20696447
- 7. Castañeda-García A, Blázquez J, Rodríguez-Rojas A (2013) Molecular mechanisms and clinical impact of acquired and intrinsic fosfomycin resistance. Antibiotics 2: 217–236.
- 8. Ho PL, Chan J, Lo WU, Lai EL, Cheung YY, Lau TC, et al. (2013) Prevalence and molecular epidemiology of plasmid-mediated fosfomycin resistance genes among blood and urinary Escherichia coli isolates. J Med Microbiol 62: 1707–1713. pmid:23988630
- 9. Ho PL, Chan J, Lo WU, Law PY, Li Z, Lai EL, et al. (2013) Dissemination of plasmid-mediated fosfomycin resistance fosA3 among multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli from livestock and other animals. J Appl Microbiol 114: 695–702. pmid:23216653
- 10. Hou J, Huang X, Deng Y, He L, Yang T, Zeng Z, et al. (2012) Dissemination of the fosfomycin resistance gene fosA3 with CTX-M beta-lactamase genes and rmtB carried on IncFII plasmids among Escherichia coli isolates from pets in China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56: 2135–2138. pmid:22232290
- 11. Hou J, Yang X, Zeng Z, Lv L, Yang T, Lin D, et al. (2013) Detection of the plasmid-encoded fosfomycin resistance gene fosA3 in Escherichia coli of food-animal origin. J Antimicrob Chemother 68: 766–770. pmid:23190765
- 12. Lee SY, Park YJ, Yu JK, Jung S, Kim Y, Jeong SH, et al. (2012) Prevalence of acquired fosfomycin resistance among extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates in Korea and IS26-composite transposon surrounding fosA3. J Antimicrob Chemother 67: 2843–2847. pmid:22893681
- 13. Sato N, Kawamura K, Nakane K, Wachino J, Arakawa Y (2013) First detection of fosfomycin resistance gene fosA3 in CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli isolates from healthy individuals in Japan. Microb Drug Resist 19: 477–482. pmid:23909549
- 14. Wachino J, Yamane K, Suzuki S, Kimura K, Arakawa Y (2010) Prevalence of fosfomycin resistance among CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli clinical isolates in Japan and identification of novel plasmid-mediated fosfomycin-modifying enzymes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54: 3061–3064. pmid:20404116
- 15.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Twenty-third informational supplement. Document M100-S23 CLSI, Wayne, PA (2013)
- 16. Ma L, Lu PL, Siu LK, Hsieh MH (2013) Molecular typing and resistance mechanisms of imipenem-non-susceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae in Taiwan: results from the Taiwan surveillance of antibiotic resistance (TSAR) study, 2002–2009. J Med Microbiol 62: 101–107. pmid:23002067
- 17. Tseng SP, Wang JT, Liang CY, Lee PS, Chen YC, Lu PL. (2014) First Report of blaIMP-8 in Raoultella planticola. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58: 593–595. pmid:24145534
- 18. Diestra K, Juan C, Curiao T, Moyá B, Miró E, Oteo J, et al. (2009) Characterization of plasmids encoding blaESBL and surrounding genes in Spanish clinical isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Antimicrob Chemother 63: 60–66. pmid:18988679
- 19. Bailey JK, Pinyon JL, Anantham S, Hall RM (2011) Distribution of the blaTEM gene and blaTEM-containing transposons in commensal Escherichia coli. J Antimicrob Chemother 66: 745–751. pmid:21393132
- 20. Carattoli A, Bertini A, Villa L, Falbo V, Hopkins KL, Threlfall EJ. (2005) Identification of plasmids by PCR-based replicon typing. J Microbiol Methods 63: 219–228. pmid:15935499
- 21. Nilsson AI, Berg OG, Aspevall O, Kahlmeter G, Andersson DI (2003) Biological costs and mechanisms of fosfomycin resistance in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47: 2850–2858. pmid:12936984
- 22. Takahata S, Ida T, Hiraishi T, Sakakibara S, Maebashi K, Terada S, et al. (2010) Molecular mechanisms of fosfomycin resistance in clinical isolates of Escherichia coli. Int J Antimicrob Agents 35: 333–337. pmid:20071153
- 23. Liu HY, Lin HC, Lin YC, Yu SH, Wu WH, Lee YJ. (2011) Antimicrobial susceptibilities of urinary extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae to fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin in a teaching hospital in Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 44: 364–368. pmid:21524974
- 24. Lu CL, Liu CY, Huang YT, Liao CH, Teng LJ, Turnidge JD, et al. (2011) Antimicrobial susceptibilities of commonly encountered bacterial isolates to fosfomycin determined by agar dilution and disk diffusion methods. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55: 4295–4301. pmid:21670185
- 25. Couce A, Briales A, Rodríguez-Rojas A, Costas C, Pascual A, Blázquez J. (2012) Genomewide overexpression screen for fosfomycin resistance in Escherichia coli: MurA confers clinical resistance at low fitness cost. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56: 2767–2769. pmid:22371901
- 26. Skarzynski T, Mistry A, Wonacott A, Hutchinson SE, Kelly VA, Duncan K. (1996) Structure of UDP-N-acetylglucosamine enolpyruvyl transferase, an enzyme essential for the synthesis of bacterial peptidoglycan, complexed with substrate UDP-N-acetylglucosamine and the drug fosfomycin. Structure 4: 1465–1474. pmid:8994972
- 27. Carattoli A (2009) Resistance plasmid families in Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53: 2227–2238. pmid:19307361
- 28. Carattoli A (2013) Plasmids and the spread of resistance. Int J Med Microbiol 303: 298–304. pmid:23499304
- 29. Yan JJ, Ko WC, Tsai SH, Wu HM, Jin YT, Wu JJ. (2000) Dissemination of CTX-M-3 and CMY-2 beta-lactamases among clinical isolates of Escherichia coli in southern Taiwan. J Clin Microbiol 38: 4320–4325. pmid:11101558
- 30. Yu WL, Chuang YC, Walther-Rasmussen J (2006) Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in Taiwan: epidemiology, detection, treatment and infection control. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 39: 264–277. pmid:16926972
- 31. Mollet B, Iida S, Shepherd J, Arber W (1983) Nucleotide sequence of IS26, a new prokaryotic mobile genetic element. Nucleic Acids Res 11: 6319–6330. pmid:6312419
- 32. Miriagou V, Carattoli A, Tzelepi E, Villa L, Tzouvelekis LS (2005) IS26-associated In4-type integrons forming multiresistance loci in enterobacterial plasmids. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49: 3541–3543. pmid:16048979
- 33. Coque TM, Novais A, Carattoli A, Poirel L, Pitout J, Peixe L, et al. (2008) Dissemination of clonally related Escherichia coli strains expressing extended-spectrum beta-lactamase CTX-M-15. Emerg Infect Dis 14: 195–200. pmid:18258110
- 34. Lartigue MF, Poirel L, Nordmann P (2004) Diversity of genetic environment of blaCTX-M genes. FEMS Microbiol Lett 234: 201–207. pmid:15135523
- 35. Ma L, Siu LK, Lu PL (2011) Effect of spacer sequences between blaCTX-M and ISEcp1 on blaCTX-M expression. J Med Microbiol 60: 1787–1792. pmid:21799195