Pharmacology of the Adenosine A3 Receptor in the Vasculature and Essential Hypertension

Ming-Fen Ho; Leanne M. Low; Roselyn B. Rose’Meyer

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150021

Abstract

Background

Essential hypertension is considered to be a multifactorial disorder and its aetiology has yet to be clearly identified. As the adenosine receptors have a significant role in mediating vasodilation, alterations in their structures or signalling pathways may be involved in the development of hypertension. This study aimed to measure the expression of adenosine A₃ receptors in a range of cardiovascular tissues and determine whether they could be altered with essential hypertension, and to functionally test responses to adenosine A₃ receptor agonists in coronary blood vessels using the isolated perfused heart preparation.

Methods

mRNA samples from cardiovascular tissues and a range of blood vessels were collected from 10 week old male spontaneously hypertensive rats and age-gender matched Wistar rats (n = 8). The Langendorff heart perfusion preparation was used to characterise adenosine A₃ receptor mediated coronary vasodilation in the rat heart.

Results

Adenosine A₃ receptor agonists induced coronary vasodilation. The expression of adenosine A₃ receptors in cardiovascular tissues was altered in a tissue-specific pattern. Specifically, down-regulation of adenosine A₃ receptor expression occurred in hypertensive hearts, which might be associated with attenuated vasodilator responses observed in coronary vessels to adenosine A₃ receptor agonists.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated alterations in the expression of adenosine A₃ receptors occurred in a tissue specific mode, and reduced adenosine A₃ receptor mediated coronary vasodilation in hearts from spontaneously hypertensive rats. Our findings with regard to changes in the adenosine A₃ receptor in hypertensive hearts suggest that adenosine A₃ receptor might play a role in the physiopathology of essential hypertension and potentially open the way to pharmacologic manipulation of vasomotor activity by the use of adenosine A₃ receptor agonists.

Citation: Ho M-F, Low LM, Rose’Meyer RB (2016) Pharmacology of the Adenosine A₃ Receptor in the Vasculature and Essential Hypertension. PLoS ONE 11(2): e0150021. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150021

Editor: Daniel-Christoph Wagner, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, GERMANY

Received: October 28, 2015; Accepted: February 8, 2016; Published: February 23, 2016

Copyright: © 2016 Ho et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This research is supported by a Griffith University International Postgraduate Research Scholarship (GUIPRS) and a Griffith University Postgraduate Research Scholarship (GUPRS).

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Abbreviations: ADORs, Adenosine receptors; BMI, Body mass index; BP, Blood pressure; APNEA, N⁶-2-(4-aminophenyl)ethyladenosine; CI-IB-MECA, 2-chloro-N⁶-(3-iodobenzyl)adenosine-5'-N-methylcarboxamide; CGS 21680, 2-[p-(2-carboxyethyl)-phenethylamino]-5'-N-ethylcarboxamido adenosine; CPP, Coronary perfusion pressure; HWR, Heart weight to body weight ratio; LVDP, Left ventricular developed pressure; RAAS, Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system; SHRs, Spontaneously hypertensive rats; HT, Hypertensive; NIBP, Non-invasive blood pressure; NT, Normotensive; MAP, Mean arterial pressure; TPR, Total peripheral resistance

Introduction

Essential hypertension (EH) is a major public health issue that is estimated to affect 20% of the adult population worldwide [1,2]. It is considered to be a multifactorial disorder and its aetiology has yet to be clearly identified. Adenosine is a well-established vasodilator and its receptors are widely distributed throughout the cardiovascular system [3,4]. Several studies have reported its involvement in cardiovascular disease mediated through vessel remodelling, cell proliferation, platelet aggregation and inflammatory responses [5–8]. The four adenosine receptor (ADOR) subtypes: A₁, A_2A, A_2B and A₃ are involved in vasodilator function through different intracellular signalling pathways [9]. Adenosine is synthesized and released from vascular smooth muscle cells and cardiac fibroblasts, cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells [10]. These receptors are widely distributed throughout the body and are able to mediate a number of different functions. In the heart, the cardioprotective role of adenosine is mediated through the adenosine A₁, A_2A and A₃ receptors, all of which have been demonstrated to cause coronary vasodilation. While the adenosine A₁ and A₂ receptors have been extensively researched, the present study focused on the adenosine A₃ receptor in terms of the gene expression in cardiovascular tissues and functional role in EH.

The adenosine A₃ receptor is coupled to several types of G-proteins. The adenosine A₃ receptor inhibits adenylyl cyclase via G_i protein. This receptor is also coupled to the G_q protein and stimulates phospholipase C and calcium mobilization. Following activation of the adenosine A₃ receptor, the formation of phospholipase C stimulates inositol-3-phosphate and diacylglycerol production. This in turn, increases the intracellular calcium concentration and activates protein kinase C, which then interacts with K_ATP channels and calcium channels in sarcoplasmic reticulum to cause vasodilation [11–13].

Adenosine A₃ receptor selective agonists have been reported to stimulate cardiac preconditioning through activation of the K_ATP channels and stimulation of the RhoA-phospholipase D1 signalling pathways [14]. A role for adenosine A₃ receptor mediated vasodilation in mouse aorta has also been demonstrated with the selective adenosine A₃ receptor agonist 2-chloro-N⁶-(3-iodobenzyl)adenosine-5'-N-methylcarboxamide (CI-IB-MECA) which induced relaxation of the vessel at very high concentrations (100μM) [15]. While there has been extensive research into its structure and function, there are still gaps in knowledge, particularly the role of adenosine A₃ receptors in EH.

This study was designed to investigate the expression of adenosine A₃ receptor in cardiovascular tissues and a range of blood vessels from Wistar and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs)—a well-established model of hypertension [16], and to determine whether they are altered with EH. Subsequently, we determined the functional role of adenosine A₃ receptors in the coronary blood vessels using the isolated Langendorff perfused heart preparation—a useful tool in cardiovascular and pharmacological research [17]. This study investigated the expression of adenosine A₃ receptor in a number of tissues and characterised adenosine A₃ receptor mediated coronary vasodilation in the rat heart using selective agents. Functional changes in adenosine A₃ receptor populations might play a critical role in the pathology of EH.

Methods and Materials

Ethics statement

The study protocol complied with Australian Ethical Standards and was approved by the Griffith University Ethics Committee. Functional studies of the adenosine A₃ receptor in the coronary blood vessels was performed using tissues from 10 week-old male spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) and age-matched Wistar rats (ARC, Australia).

Conscious rat systolic blood pressure

Conscious rat systolic blood pressure was measured using a non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) system. The tail cuff and the pulse transducer were placed at the proximal end of the tail. The data were recorded by ML125NIBP power lab system. Rats were resting in the cage for at least 2 hours prior to measuring blood pressure in order to reduce stress-related increases in blood pressure responses. Three readings were taken before sampling.

Sample preparation of animal tissues

Rats were housed in a room at a temperature of 23 ± 2°C, a 12 hour light-dark cycle with free access to food and water at all times. Rats were anaesthetised using pentobarbital (60mg/kg, IP). Whole blood was collected by performing a cardiac puncture procedure. Blood samples were collected into PAXgene blood RNA tubes (QIAGEN, Australia) and stored at -80°C before processing. Dissection was immediately carried out after blood sampling. Atria, left ventricle, thoracic aorta, kidney, portal vein, mesenteric vessels and retina were isolated and dissected from surrounding fat and tissues. Tissues were then frozen using liquid nitrogen and were stored at -80°C before processing.

RNA extraction

Blood samples (2.5ml) were collected using PAXgene tubes. RNA isolation protocol followed the PAXgene blood RNA system (QIAGEN, Australia). RNA extraction protocol, as per manufacturer’s instructions, was followed. RNA samples from tissues were extracted using the RNeasy plus mini kit (QIAGEN, Australia). The yield of total RNA and the 260/280 ratio was measured using the Nanodrop^® ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, USA). cDNA was synthesised from 5μg of total RNA using random decamer primers (Geneworks, Australia) and AffinityScript^TM multiple temperature reverse transcriptase (Stratagene, USA).

Real time PCR

Gene expression was measured using real time PCR. Primer sequences of internal controls and the adenosine A₃ receptor are listed in the S1 Appendix. Details for reference gene stability analysis and primer efficiency analysis as described in the S1 Appendix. 18S rRNA and β-actin (ACTB) were utilised as the internal housekeeping genes for this experiment as they have been reported to be as reliable reference genes for gene expression analysis of human ADORs [18]. The PCR mixture contained 2μl of cDNA, 4μl of 5X EvaGreen^® qPCR Mix Plus (ROX) buffer, 1μl of each primer (5mM) and distilled water up to 20μl per reaction. Real time PCR reactions were performed in duplicate using Rotor Gene Q (QIAGEN, Australia). The 2^-ΔΔCt method was employed for statistical data analysis.

Langendorff isolated heart preparation

The non re-circulating Langendorff isolated heart preparation [17] was used to investigate cardiovascular function, specifically the role of adenosine receptor induced coronary vasodilation in control and hypertensive hearts. For each preparation, the rat was anaesthetized using pentobarbitone sodium (60mg/kg, IP). Subsequently, the heart was excised and prepared using Krebs-Henseleit solution (118mmol/L NaCl, 4.7mmol/L KCl, 1.75mmol/L CaCl_2, 1.2mmol/L MgSO₄, 11mmol/L glucose, 0.5mmol/L EDTA, 25mmol/L NaHCO₃). The aorta was cannulated and the heart perfused at a flow rate to maintain 80mmHg coronary perfusion pressure with Krebs-Henseleit solution gassed with 95% O₂ and 5% CO₂ and kept at 37°C. Ventricular fluid accumulation was prevented by inserting a small piece of polyethylene tubing through the apex of the left ventricle to drain the cavity and maintain aortic valve patency. A water-filled latex balloon was then introduced into the left ventricle and connected to a pressure transducer (Gould P23-ID, Oxnard Ca). End-diastolic pressure was adjusted to 4-8mmHg by inflating the balloon. Ventricular pressure was monitored continuously using a MacLab data acquisition system (ADInstruments, Castle Hill, Australia). Coronary perfusion pressure was measured using a pressure transducer connected to a water filled probe inserted into the side arm of the aortic cannula and was recorded using the Maclab data acquisition system. The left ventricular pressure signal was electronically differentiated to measure dP/dt_(max) and dP/dt_(min). Hearts were allowed to equilibrate for a period of 30 minutes. During equilibration functional measurements were also taken. The adenosine A₃ receptor was investigated in Wistar (n = 8) or hypertensive hearts (n = 8). APNEA and CL-IB-MECA (10⁻⁹–10^-5M), adenosine A₃ receptor agonists [11], concentration response curves were performed in the absence of the adenosine A₁, A_2A and A_2B antagonist, 8-(p-sulfophenyl) theophylline (8SPT) [19]. The heart was then allowed to equilibrate and coronary perfusion pressure to recover back to 80mmHg. APNEA (a non-selective adenosine receptor agonist known to have a high affinity for the adenosine A₁ and A₃ receptors) or CL-IB-MECA (a selective A₃ agonist) concentration response curves were then repeated in the presence of the nonselective adenosine A₁ and A₂ receptor antagonist, 8SPT (10^-5M). This allowed the isolation of the adenosine A₃ receptors and demonstration of its effects in the heart.

Measurements of parameters and statistical analysis

Data collected from the concentration response curves were statistically analysed and graphed using GraphPad PRISM 5.0 for Mac. All data is presented as mean ± S.E.M, unless stated otherwise. Concentration response curves to APNEA and CL-IB-MECA were analysed using nonlinear regression, from which EC₅₀ values and 95% confidence intervals were also derived. One-way or two-way ANOVA were performed on the data, followed by Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test/Bonferroni for individual comparisons when significant effects were detected. Differences were considered significant at p<0.05. A Student’s t test was utilised to analyse whether the relative mRNA expression from the hypertensive group was statistically different to the control group values for the adenosine receptor subtypes.

Results

As adenosine receptors have an important role in moderating vascular function, the purpose of this study was to firstly determine whether the expression of adenosine A₃ receptors might be altered in cardiovascular tissues of SHRs, and secondly to determine whether there is pathophysiological relevance in EH. Therefore, we set out to study the differences in expression of the adenosine A₃ receptor between SHRs and Wistar rats using samples from atria, left ventricle, blood, kidney and a range of blood vessels, and to investigate the functional role of the adenosine A₃ receptor in modulating coronary artery vasodilation.

The expression of adenosine A₃ receptor was associated with essential hypertension in a tissue specific fashion

In the first step of this study, we set out to determine the mRNA expression of adenosine A₃ receptors and its splice variant in the hypertensive and normotensive groups (SHRs v.s Wistar rats). A significant difference in the expression of the adenosine A₃ receptor was seen between various vascular beds, see Fig 1. Adenosine A₃ receptor expression was down-regulated in the left ventricle, atria, thoracic aorta and portal vein of SHRs when compared to control Wistar rats (p < 0.05). However, in blood and kidney samples, the expression of adenosine A₃ receptor in the hypertensive group did not display significant difference to the age-matched control group (p > 0.05). As the Ct values for the adenosine A₃ receptor splice variant in blood, left ventricle, kidney, throacic aorta, portal vein, renal arteries and mesenteric vessels were above 35, the increased variablity made quantification unreliable [20]. Consequently, the adenosine A₃ receptor splice variant was excluded from the analysis of relative expression levels in these samples. We observed the adenosine A₃ receptor expression was different between tissue types and with hypertension. The next series of functional experiments were used to elucidate the functional activity of the adenosine A₃ receptor in vascular tissues with the development of EH in this model.

Download:

Fig 1. Relative mRNA expression of adenosine A₃ receptor in a range of cardiovascular tissues.

The 2^-ΔΔCt method was used to calculate relative mRNA expression. A Student’s t test was then performed as compared spontaneously hypertensive rat group (HT) with normotensive group (NT), (n = 8 for each group). Data were presented in mean±SEM. Three independent experiments were performed in duplicates. *p<0.05, **p<0.0005.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150021.g001

Baseline measurements of rats and isolated hearts

Body weight of SHRs was lower when compared to age-matched Wistar rats (p<0.05, see Table 1). The systolic blood pressure in the hypertensive rat group was significantly higher than Wistar control rat group (p<0.05). Heart weights were similar (p>0.05), however when corrected for body weight, a ratio of 0.33 ± 0.01% and 0.42 ± 0.01% was observed for Wistar and SHR rats respectively, indicating that SHR hearts were significantly larger in comparison to Wistar rats (p<0.05). With respect to heart function, the basal level of coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) was similar between the two groups studied (See Table 1).

Download:

Table 1. Baseline parameters (absence of any antagonist) for control Wistar rats and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150021.t001

However, the left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP), dP/dt_(max) and dP/dt_(min) were found to be significantly higher in hearts from SHRs when compared to age-matched control rats (p<0.05), see Table 2. In hearts from SHRs, the heart rate was approximately 14% lower than hearts for control rats (p<0.05).

Download:

Table 2. Baseline functional parameters for Control Wistar and spontaneously hypertensive rats in the absence and presence of 8SPT (10^-5M).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150021.t002

Effects of APNEA, CL-IB-MECA and 8SPT on coronary vasodilation in isolated hearts

Concentrations of APNEA, a non-selective adenosine receptor agonist known to have a high affinity for the adenosine A₁ and A₃ receptors [11] or CL-IB-MECA, a selective A₃ agonist [19] ranging from 10^-9M to 10^-5M were used in the presence and absence of the non-selective adenosine A₁ and A₂ receptor antagonist, 8SPT (10^-5M), which was used to isolate the adenosine A₃ receptor during the experimental setting. The presence of 8SPT (10^-5M), did not influence baseline functional parameters in hearts from control or SHR rats (p>0.05).

APNEA caused a concentration-dependent decrease in coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) in the absence of 8SPT in both normotensive and SHR rats (See Fig 2), however the response to APNEA in hypertensive hearts was depressed compared to control hearts (p<0.05). In the presence of 8SPT, which allowed the isolation of adenosine A₃ receptor and demonstration of its mediated effects, a right-wards shift in the curve could be clearly seen in the normotensive group, indicating APNEA was able to induce coronary vasodilation mediated via the adenosine A₃ receptor (Fig 2A). However, this was significantly different to hearts from SHR rats, which showed no response to APNEA in the presence of 8SPT (p<0.05), see Fig 2B. In addition to this, a vasoconstrictor effect was seen to precede vasodilation in the presence of 8SPT in control and hypertensive heart at lower concentrations (10⁻⁹–10^-6M).

Download:

Fig 2.

Concentration response curves showing the effects of the agonist APNEA in the absence and presence of 8SPT (10^-5M) in (A) normotensive rats and (B) spontaneously hypertensive rats. Concentration response curves to APNEA were analysed using nonlinear regression, from which EC₅₀ values and 95% confidence intervals were also derived. One-way or two-way ANOVA were performed on the data, followed by Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test/Bonferroni for individual comparisons when significant effects were detected. *denotes statistical significant difference (p<0.05) to absence of antagonist group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150021.g002

We performed the same experiment using CL-IB-MECA, a selective adenosine A₃ agonist, which also showed a concentration-dependent decrease in CPP in hearts from SHR and age-matched control Wistar rats (p<0.05) (Fig 3). As with APNEA, there was a significant difference in concentration response curves in the absence of 8SPT in between hearts from normotensive and hypertensive rats. Specifically, hearts from SHR rats showed an attenuated response (p<0.05). Concentration curves in the presence of 8SPT (10^-5M) caused a significant shift of the CL-IB-MECA curve in both groups studied (p<0.05) (Fig 3). Significant differences in APNEA and CL-IB-MECA concentration response curves on coronary perfusion pressure between control and SHR were observed (p<0.05). A decrease in the potency for APNEA was observed, whereas a slight increase in potency was seen for CL-IB-MECA. The pEC₅₀ values obtained for APNEA in the presence or absence of 8SPT were significantly higher in control Wistar rats. No significant difference was observed for pEC₅₀ values of CL-IB-MECA between control and SHR hearts, (See Table 3).

Download:

Fig 3.

Concentration response curve showing the effects of CL-IB-MECA in the absence and presence of 8SPT (10^-5M) in (A) normotensive rats and (B) spontaneously hypertensive rats. Concentration response curves to CL-IB-MECA were analysed using nonlinear regression, from which EC₅₀ values and 95% confidence intervals were also derived. One-way or two-way ANOVA were performed on the data, followed by Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test/Bonferroni for individual comparisons when significant effects were detected. *denotes statistical significance (p<0.05) compared to absence of antagonist group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150021.g003

Download:

Table 3. pEC₅₀ values for APNEA and CL-IB-MECA concentration response curves in the absence and presence of 8SPT (10^-5M) for control (normotensive Wistar rats) and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150021.t003

The effect of 8SPT on heart contractile responses to APNEA and CL-IB-MECA can be seen in Fig 4. With respect to APNEA (10^-5M), left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) decreased approximately 20mmHg in normotensive rats, however, in the presence of 8SPT, APNEA did not alter LVDP (p>0.05). In contrast, APNEA caused an approximately 40mmHg increase in LVDP in hearts from SHR (Fig 4A), which was significantly different to the control group (p<0.05). However, this effect of APNEA on LVDP was completely blocked in the presence of 8SPT in hearts from SHR (p<0.05). There was also a significant difference between normotensive and hypertensive rats in relation to dP/dt_(max), in which at APNEA (10^-5M) caused an increase in dP/dt_(max) in hearts from SHR without affecting contractility in hearts from normotensive rats (p<0.05). The addition of 8SPT caused no significant effect in control hearts. However, in hypertensive hearts, as with LVDP, 8SPT completely blocked effects of APNEA on dP/dt_(max) (p<0.05). In addition, the effect of CL-IB-MECA (10^-5M) on LVDP and dP/dt_(max) displayed no significant difference between control Wistar and SHRs (p>0.05), see Fig 4B. There were also no alterations to effects of CL-IB-MECA (10^-5M) on heart contractile responses in the presence of 8SPT (p>0.05). This suggests that contractile responses to APNEA in hearts from SHR may be mediated via adenosine A₁ receptors as CL-IB-MECA has very low affinity for this adenosine receptor subtype.

Download:

Fig 4.

Mean decrease in (A) left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) and (B) the left ventricle contractility (dP/dt) maximum at the concentration of 10^-5M of APNEA or CL-IB-MECA for control normotensive rats (NT) and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Data obtained from each group was statistically analysed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test/Bonferroni correction. *A p value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150021.g004

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to investigate alterations in the expression of adenosine A₃ receptors between SHRs and Wistar rats in the left ventricle, atria, blood, kidney and a range of blood vessels, and to determine the functional role of the adenosine A₃ receptor in modulating coronary artery vasodilation. Spontaneously hypertensive rats were developed in 1963 and have been used extensively in high blood pressure research [16]. Because of the numerous limitations for sample collection in human studies, animal models of high blood pressure have been used to study physiological and genetic variants that may contribute to the development of essential hypertension (EH). Animals can exhibit several characteristics similar to those observed in humans with EH with the advantage of reducing the heterogeneity of genetic studies, as confounding factors are a major challenge for human genetic studies. Additionally, animal models are superior for characterising structural and functional variants, and in particular for performing invasive measurements and mechanistic studies [21]. Unlike human studies, an animal model can be controlled for many environmental factors, hence the research can focus on the genetic causes of hypertension.

Spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) have been developed from the Wistar strain, without any treatment to induce high blood. Hence, it has been commonly used in research to study EH [16]. SHR blood pressure increases with age. The systolic blood pressure in SHRs rises to 150mmHg after 4 weeks of age and will reach a constant level approximately 170mmHg after 10 weeks [22]. Another study reported hemodynamic observed a significant increase in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and total peripheral resistance (TPR) at age 80–120 days was reported [23]. Additionally, SHRs develop complications of hypertension such as cerebral haemorrhage, nephrosclerosis and myocardial lesions [24]. With respect to gender differences, the body weights of male hypertensive rats were slightly increased when compared to female hypertensive rats. Furthermore, the systolic blood pressure level in male SHRs is about 11mmHg higher than female SHRs at 11 weeks of age. On the contrary, the blood pressure and body weights were not significantly different between male and female normotensive rats [16]. In order to eliminate variability due to effects of the sexual hormone oestrogen, which is known to affect cardiovascular function, this study only used male animals at 10 weeks of age.

In the present study, the SHR at 10 weeks of age had a conscious systolic blood pressure of approximately 174mmHg compared to age-matched Wistar rat systolic blood pressure of 108mmHg. Chronic hypertension causes an increase of left ventricular mass and is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events [25]. Echocardiography and heart weight to body weight ratio (HWR) are commonly used to determine the presence of left ventricle hypertrophy. Left ventricle hypertrophy has been reported to develop in SHRs by 4 weeks of age [26]. Heart weight to body weight ratio is associated with high blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) [27]. Similar outcomes were confirmed in the present study as the HWR was significantly greater in 10 week old SHRs when compared to Wistar rats. Baseline parameters such as body weight, heart weight, and systolic blood pressure were obtained before perfusion on the Langendorff apparatus. Parameters such as left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP), and ventricle maximum and minimum slope (dP/dt_max/min) were acquired during perfusion in the absence and presence of the adenosine A₁ and A₂ receptor antagonist, 8SPT (See Table 2). Comparison of these parameters between control and hypertensive hearts found that the latter tended to have increased heart contractile responses (LVDP and dP/dt_max/min) under basal conditions (p<0.05) (see Table 2). Systolic blood pressure was also significantly higher in hypertensive rats (p<0.05). These significant differences in parameters indicate that hearts obtained from the SHR strain had developed a hypertensive phenotype [28].

We observed a substantial reduction in the expression of adenosine A₃ receptors in the left ventricle, atria, thoracic aorta, portal vein and retina of 10 week SHRs. However, the expression pattern displayed a tissue-specific pattern (Fig 1). Kidneys have been reported to have a significant role in blood pressure control via renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and adenosine receptors are considered to be involved in kidney pathophysiology in the development of hypertension. However, the mRNA expression of adenosine A₃ receptor was below detectable levels in the renal artery (data not shown). In the present study, the expression of adenosine A₃ receptors from blood samples reflected mRNA expression in kidney tissues, and did not show any significant difference between control Wistar rats and SHRs (Fig 1). We observed a substantial increase in the expression of adenosine A₃ receptors in the mesenteric vessels from SHRs. It has been reported that mesenteric artery remodelling is associated with essential hypertension in human and rodent models [29]. In the present study, we have demonstrated that alterations in adenosine A₃ receptor expression might contribute to essential hypertension. These results reveal the complexities of location and function of the adenosine A₃ receptors in the vasculature.

The splice variant of adenosine A₃ receptor was detected in brain and retina. A previous study investigating splice variants of the dopamine receptor reported that mRNA expression of the splice variants was elevated in the brain of SHRs with a possible role in the development of hypertension [30]. In the present study, we confirmed the expression of the adenosine A₃ receptor splice variant was higher in the brain of SHRs compared to Wistar rats (data not shown), while there were no differences in the retina. Further study is warranted to characterise the splice variants of the adenosine A₃ receptor and to determine whether it has a pathophysiological role in EH.

The expression of adenosine A₃ receptor was down-regulated in the hearts of SHRs. We therefore set out to investigate the pharmacological effects of adenosine A₃ receptor agonists on coronary vasodilation using the Langendorff heart perfusion preparation. Hearts were taken from a hypertensive model, in this case the SHRs, in addition to age-matched Wistar rats, which acted as the control. The Wistar rat is used as the control group as it is the strain from which the SHR rat is derived [31]. Hearts were prepared as outlined in Methods. The next series of functional experiments was to describe effects of APNEA, CL-IB-MECA and 8SPT on coronary adenosine A₃ receptors. Isolation of the adenosine A₃ receptor was achieved through the use of the adenosine A₁ receptor and the adenosine A₂ receptor antagonist, 8SPT (10^-5M), and mediated effects were observed through the use of varying concentrations of either the partially selective adenosine A₃ receptor agonist, APNEA, or selective the adenosine A₃ receptor agonist, CL-IB-MECA. The adenosine A₃ receptor has been reported to be present in rat aortic smooth muscle while pharmacological investigations have provided evidence for its presence in the coronary vessels of guinea pigs [32]. The adenosine A₃ receptor has been reported to cause vasodilation in the heart, which has been achieved through the use of APNEA and CL-IB-MECA [33]. Concentration response curves of APNEA and CL-IB-MECA were performed in the absence and presence of the antagonist, 8SPT (10^-5M). Perfusion of hearts with 8SPT present in Krebs-Hensleit solution, which allowed the blockade of the adenosine A₁ receptor and adenosine A₂ receptor induced vasodilation, adenosine A₁ receptor mediated bradycardia, and isolation of the adenosine A₃ receptor. Fozard and Carruthers [34] first demonstrated the use of 8SPT to isolate the adenosine A₃ receptor, showing a decrease in blood pressure despite the presence of 8SPT, and thus concluded that it was unlikely to be mediated by the adenosine A₁ receptor or the adenosine A₂ receptor [34]. The discovery of the adenosine A₃ receptor in rats by Zhou et al [35] provided an explanation for the drop in blood pressure, and thus the observations of Fozard and Carruthers have been attributed to the adenosine A₃ receptor, although 8SPT is also able to block the adenosine A₁ receptor mediated bradycardia, which alternatively could alter coronary flow rates and pressures [34]. Coronary vascular smooth muscle relaxant responses to both APNEA and CL-IB-MECA were observed in control hearts in the absence of 8SPT. However, the coronary vasodilator responses to adenosine A₃ agonists in SHR hearts were significantly decreased compared to control tissues. In the presence of 8SPT, a rightwards shift in the curve and vasodilator response was observed in control hearts. However, in hypertensive hearts, neither APNEA nor CL-IB-MECA was able to elicit a relaxant response, which might be associated with down-regulation of the adenosine A₃ receptor in the heart (Fig 1). While a decrease in the adenosine A₃ receptor expression was found, an increase in mRNA expression of the adenosine A₁ receptor was observed in SHR hearts (Fig 5), thus the vasodilator response observed in the absence of 8SPT was thought to possibly be adenosine A₁ receptor mediated.

Download:

Fig 5. The relative expression of adenosine receptor subtype mRNA in left ventricle.

A Student’s t test was performed as compared spontaneously hypertensive rat group (HT) with normotensive group (NT), (n = 8 for each group), *A p value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150021.g005

In addition to the relaxant responses, an unexpected vasoconstrictor effect was also observed to precede vasodilation in the presence of 8SPT in both control and hypertensive hearts. Vasoconstriction has also been recognised to be caused by the adenosine A₁ receptor in the coronary vessels, counteracting the adenosine A₂ receptor mediated vasodilator response [9]. However, as the vasoconstrictor response was observed during perfusion with 8SPT, the adenosine A₁ receptors would presumably be blocked. Therefore, the effect is unlikely due to this receptor subtype. There has been some evidence of vasoconstriction caused indirectly by the adenosine A₃ receptors via mast cell activation to cause the release of histamine and thromboxane in peripheral tissues [9]. However, histamine mediated effects are primarily that of vasodilation whilst thromboxanes are known to be released from platelets. As this experimental protocol utilizes physiological salt solutions to perfuse the hearts, these events are unlikely due to lack of blood circulating [36]. Other studies have found that deletions of the adenosine A₃ receptor gene were associated with a higher degree of coronary vasodilation, suggesting that the adenosine A₃ receptor may additionally have a role in regulating vascular tone through its inhibitory nature via the G_i protein to cause decreases in cellular cAMP in smooth muscle [9].

A significant increase in LVDP and dP/dt_(max) during perfusion with APNEA occurred in the absence of 8SPT in hypertensive hearts, which was not observed in the control hearts. These effects were completely blocked in the presence of 8SPT in hypertensive hearts. As 8SPT was able to block this mediated increase in contractility, the effect may be elicited by the adenosine A₁ receptors or the adenosine A₂ receptors. As mentioned previously, there was a significant increase in the adenosine A₁ receptor expression in SHR hearts compared to control hearts. This receptor subtype, is reported to mediate negative inotropic effects, however this research may indicate adenosine A₁ receptors in a hypertensive model may mediate an increase in cardiac contractility.

Furthermore, decreases in the adenosine A_2A receptor and the adenosine A_2B receptor subtypes, in addition to the adenosine A₃ receptor had also been shown to decrease in the hypertensive heart compared to control (Fig 5). While adenosine A_2A receptor subtype is not particularly well known to cause an increase in contractility, this occurrence has been previously reported [37], showing that increased contractility could be mediated by the adenosine A_2A receptor in ventricular myocytes from rats, although not as potently as the β1-adrenoceptor mediated stimulation. It has also been reported to occur in avian embryo ventricular myocytes [38]. Cardiac contraction is achieved through an increase in intracellular Ca²⁺ levels and protein kinase A and protein kinase C pathways [37]. There is, however, controversy over the ability of the adenosine A_2A receptor to have a positive inotropic effect due to a number of studies revealing otherwise, such as Willems and Headrick [39], who reported that the adenosine A_2A receptor caused no contractile effects in mouse hearts. Reports of the selective the adenosine A_2A receptor agonist, 2-[p-(2-carboxyethyl)-phenethylamino]-5'-N-ethylcarboxamido adenosine (CGS-21680) causing increased LVDP and coronary flow were suggested to be instead due to the Gregg phenomenon in which increased flow increases ventricular function [40]. Our results demonstrate that the coronary flow rates are similar between groups and greater vasodilator responses were observed in control hearts. Chandrasekera et al [41] also reported no contractile effect but instead a strong vasodilator response. They did however observe increases in contractility when testing the adenosine A_2B receptor although this finding has limited support [41]. The reported findings of increased contractility or lack of in the literature were all performed on myocytes obtained from healthy models, whereas the findings of increased contractility were observed in hypertensive rats, suggesting that more extensive research is required to not only determine the subtype responsible but differences in pathological state.

In summary, this study characterised the effect of adenosine A₃ receptor on coronary vasodilation using the Langendorff isolated heart and determined changes in the adenosine A₃ receptor with EH. These observations potentially open the way to pharmacologic manipulation of vasomotor activity by the use of adenosine A₃ agonists.

Supporting Information

S1 Appendix. Reference gene stability, PCR amplification efficiency analysis and Primer sequences.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150021.s001

(DOCX)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: MH RR. Performed the experiments: MH LL. Analyzed the data: MH LL RR. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MH LL RR. Wrote the paper: MH LL RR. Read and approved the final manuscript: MH LL RR.

References

1. Montecucco F, Pende A, Quercioli A, Mach F (2011) Inflammation in the pathophysiology of essential hypertension. J Nephrol 24: 23–34. pmid:20437401
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, et al. (2003) Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension 42: 1206–1252. pmid:14656957
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Hove-Madsen L, Prat-Vidal C, Llach A, Ciruela F, Casadó V, et al. (2006) Adenosine A_2A receptors are expressed in human atrial myocytes and modulate spontaneous sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium release. Cardiovascular Research 72: 292–302. pmid:17014834
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Fresco P, Diniz C, Gonçalves J (2004) Facilitation of noradrenaline release by activation of adenosine A_2A receptors triggers both phospholipase C and adenylate cyclase pathways in rat tail artery. Cardiovascular Research 63: 739–746. pmid:15306230
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Feoktistov I, Wells JN, Biaggioni I (1998) Adenosine A_2B receptors as therapeutic targets. Drug Development Research 45: 198–206.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Haskó G, Csóka B, Németh ZH, Vizi ES, Pacher P (2009) A_2B adenosine receptors in immunity and inflammation. Trends in immunology 30: 263–270. pmid:19427267
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Adair TH (2005) Growth regulation of the vascular system: an emerging role for adenosine. American Journal of Physiology—Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 289: R283–R296. pmid:16014444
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Ledent C, Vaugeois J- M, Schiffmann SN, Pedrazzini T, Yacoubi ME, et al. (1997) Aggressiveness, hypoalgesia and high blood pressure in mice lacking the adenosine A2a receptor. Nature 388: 674–678. pmid:9262401
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Ho MF, Rose'Meyer RB (2013) Vascular adenosine receptors; potential clinical applications. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 11: 327–337. pmid:22724462
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Dubey RK, Gillespie DG, Mi Z, Jackson EK (1997) Exogenous and endogenous adenosine inhibits fetal calf serum induced growth of rat cardiac fibroblasts: role of A_2B receptors. Circulation 96: 2656–2666. pmid:9355907
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Jenner TL, Rose'Meyer RB (2006) Adenosine A₃ receptor mediated coronary vasodilation in the rat heart: Changes that occur with maturation. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development 127: 264–273. pmid:16309733
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Zucchi R, Yu G, Ghelardoni S, Ronca F, Ronca-Testoni S (2001) A₃ adenosine receptor stimulation modulates sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca²⁺ release in rat heart. Cardiovasc Res 50: 56–64. pmid:11282078
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Tabrizchi R, Bedi S (2001) Pharmacology of adenosine receptors in the vasculature. Pharmacology & Therapeutics 91: 133–147.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. Jacobson KA, Gao Z-G (2006) Adenosine receptors as therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov 5: 247–264. pmid:16518376
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Tawfik HE, Schnermann J, Oldenburg PJ, Mustafa SJ (2005) Role of A₁ adenosine receptors in regulation of vascular tone. American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology 288: H1411–H1416. pmid:15539423
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Kozo Okamoto KA (1963) Development of a strain of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Japanese circulation society 27: 282–292.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Skrzypiec-Spring M, Grotthus B, Szeląg A, Schulz R (2007) Isolated heart perfusion according to Langendorff—Still viable in the new millennium. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods 55: 113–126. pmid:16844390
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Kreth S, Ledderose C, Kaufmann I, Groeger G, Thiel M (2008) Differential expression of 5'-UTR splice variants of the adenosine A_2A receptor gene in human granulocytes: identification, characterization, and functional impact on activation. FASEB J 22: 3276–3286. pmid:18541693
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Haynes J, Obiako B, Thompson WJ, Downey J (1995) Adenosine-induced vasodilation: receptor characterization in pulmonary circulation. American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology 268: H1862–H1868.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Nolan T, Hands RE, Bustin SA (2006) Quantification of mRNA using real-time RT-PCR. Nat Protocols 1: 1559–1582. pmid:17406449
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Cowley AW Jr. (2006) The genetic dissection of essential hypertension. Nature Reviews Genetics 7: 829(812). pmid:17033627
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Okamoto K, Tabei R, Fukushima M, Nosaka S, Yamori Y (1966) Further observations of the development of a strain of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Jpn Circ J 30: 703–716. pmid:6012808
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Sofola OA, Knill A, Hainsworth R, Drinkhill M (2002) Change in endothelial function in mesenteric arteries of sprague-dawley rats fed a high salt diet. The Journal of Physiology 543: 255–260. pmid:12181296
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Badyal DK, Dadhich A P, Lata H (2003) Animal models of hypertension and effect of drugs. Indian Journal of pharmacology 35 349–362.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Martin TC, Bhaskar YG, Umesh KV (2008) Clinical determinants of increased left ventricular mass on echocardiogram in medically treated Afro-Caribbean hypertensive patients. West Indian Med J 57: 337–341. pmid:19566012
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Kokubo M, Uemura A, Matsubara T, Murohara T (2005) Noninvasive evaluation of the time course of change in cardiac function in spontaneously hypertensive rats by echocardiography. Hypertens Res 28: 601–609. pmid:16335889
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Wallen WJ, Cserti C, Belanger MP, Wittnich C (2000) Gender-differences in myocardial adaptation to afterload in normotensive and hypertensive rats. Hypertension 36: 774–779. pmid:11082142
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Clubb FJ Jr., Bell PD, Kriseman JD, Bishop SP (1987) Myocardial cell growth and blood pressure development in neonatal spontaneously hypertensive rats. Lab Invest 56: 189–197. pmid:3807318
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Intengan HD, Schiffrin EL (2001) Vascular Remodeling in Hypertension: Roles of Apoptosis, Inflammation, and Fibrosis. Hypertension 38: 581–587. pmid:11566935
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Autelitano DJ, van den Buuse M (1995) Altered expression of dopamine D₂ receptor rnRNA splice variants in brain and pituitary of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Neuroscience Letters 195: 1–4. pmid:7478242
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Lerman LO, Chade AR, Sica V, Napoli C (2005) Animal models of hypertension: An overview. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 146: 160–173. pmid:16131455
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Nishat S, Shabir H, Azmi AS, Ansari HR (2012) A(3) adenosine receptor: a plausible therapeutic target for cardio-protection in diabetes. Recent Pat Cardiovasc Drug Discov 7: 59–70. pmid:22300387
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Auchampach JA, Ge Z-D, Wan TC, Moore J, Gross GJ (2003) The A(3) Adenosine Receptor Agonist IB-MECA Reduces Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in Dogs. American journal of physiology Heart and circulatory physiology 285:
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Carruthers AM, Fozard JR (1993) Hypotensive responses to the putative adenosine A₃ receptor agonist N6-2-(4-aminophenyl)-ethyladenosine in the rat. Drug Development Research 30: 147–152.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
35. Zhou QY, Li C, Olah ME, Johnson RA, Stiles GL, et al. (1992) Molecular cloning and characterization of an adenosine receptor: the A₃ adenosine receptor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 89: 7432–7436. pmid:1323836
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Tapparelli C, Metternich R, Ehrhardt C, Cook NS (1993) Synthetic low-molecular weight thrombin inhibitors: molecular design and pharmacological profile. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 14: 366–376. pmid:8296393
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Dobson JG, Shea LG, Fenton RA (2008) Adenosine A_2A and β-adrenergic calcium transient and contractile responses in rat ventricular myocytes. American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology 295: H2364–H2372. pmid:18849328
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Liang BT, Haltiwanger B (1995) Adenosine A_2a and A_2b Receptors in Cultured Fetal Chick Heart Cells: High- and Low-Affinity Coupling to Stimulation of Myocyte Contractility and cAMP Accumulation. Circulation Research 76: 242–251. pmid:7834835
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Willems L, Headrick J (2007) Contractile effects of adenosine, coronary flow and perfusion pressure in murine myocardium. Pflügers Archiv—European Journal of Physiology 453: 433–441. pmid:17072640
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Dankelman J, Stassen HG, Spaan JAE (1999) Interaction between Gregg's phenomenon and coronary flow control: a model study. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 37: 742–749.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. Chandrasekera PC, McIntosh VJ, Cao FX, Lasley RD (2010) Differential effects of adenosine A_2a and A_2b receptors on cardiac contractility. American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology 299: H2082–H2089. pmid:20935155
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Montecucco F, Pende A, Quercioli A, Mach F (2011) Inflammation in the pathophysiology of essential hypertension. J Nephrol 24: 23–34. pmid:20437401
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, et al. (2003) Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension 42: 1206–1252. pmid:14656957
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Hove-Madsen L, Prat-Vidal C, Llach A, Ciruela F, Casadó V, et al. (2006) Adenosine A_2A receptors are expressed in human atrial myocytes and modulate spontaneous sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium release. Cardiovascular Research 72: 292–302. pmid:17014834
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Fresco P, Diniz C, Gonçalves J (2004) Facilitation of noradrenaline release by activation of adenosine A_2A receptors triggers both phospholipase C and adenylate cyclase pathways in rat tail artery. Cardiovascular Research 63: 739–746. pmid:15306230
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Feoktistov I, Wells JN, Biaggioni I (1998) Adenosine A_2B receptors as therapeutic targets. Drug Development Research 45: 198–206.
View Article
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Haskó G, Csóka B, Németh ZH, Vizi ES, Pacher P (2009) A_2B adenosine receptors in immunity and inflammation. Trends in immunology 30: 263–270. pmid:19427267
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[21] View Article

[22] PubMed/NCBI

[23] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Adair TH (2005) Growth regulation of the vascular system: an emerging role for adenosine. American Journal of Physiology—Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 289: R283–R296. pmid:16014444
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[25] View Article

[26] PubMed/NCBI

[27] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Ledent C, Vaugeois J- M, Schiffmann SN, Pedrazzini T, Yacoubi ME, et al. (1997) Aggressiveness, hypoalgesia and high blood pressure in mice lacking the adenosine A2a receptor. Nature 388: 674–678. pmid:9262401
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] PubMed/NCBI

[31] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Ho MF, Rose'Meyer RB (2013) Vascular adenosine receptors; potential clinical applications. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 11: 327–337. pmid:22724462
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[33] View Article

[34] PubMed/NCBI

[35] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Dubey RK, Gillespie DG, Mi Z, Jackson EK (1997) Exogenous and endogenous adenosine inhibits fetal calf serum induced growth of rat cardiac fibroblasts: role of A_2B receptors. Circulation 96: 2656–2666. pmid:9355907
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[37] View Article

[38] PubMed/NCBI

[39] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Jenner TL, Rose'Meyer RB (2006) Adenosine A₃ receptor mediated coronary vasodilation in the rat heart: Changes that occur with maturation. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development 127: 264–273. pmid:16309733
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] PubMed/NCBI

[43] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Zucchi R, Yu G, Ghelardoni S, Ronca F, Ronca-Testoni S (2001) A₃ adenosine receptor stimulation modulates sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca²⁺ release in rat heart. Cardiovasc Res 50: 56–64. pmid:11282078
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] PubMed/NCBI

[47] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Tabrizchi R, Bedi S (2001) Pharmacology of adenosine receptors in the vasculature. Pharmacology & Therapeutics 91: 133–147.
View Article
Google Scholar

[49] View Article

[50] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Jacobson KA, Gao Z-G (2006) Adenosine receptors as therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov 5: 247–264. pmid:16518376
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[52] View Article

[53] PubMed/NCBI

[54] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Tawfik HE, Schnermann J, Oldenburg PJ, Mustafa SJ (2005) Role of A₁ adenosine receptors in regulation of vascular tone. American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology 288: H1411–H1416. pmid:15539423
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[56] View Article

[57] PubMed/NCBI

[58] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Kozo Okamoto KA (1963) Development of a strain of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Japanese circulation society 27: 282–292.
View Article
Google Scholar

[60] View Article

[61] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Skrzypiec-Spring M, Grotthus B, Szeląg A, Schulz R (2007) Isolated heart perfusion according to Langendorff—Still viable in the new millennium. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods 55: 113–126. pmid:16844390
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[63] View Article

[64] PubMed/NCBI

[65] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Kreth S, Ledderose C, Kaufmann I, Groeger G, Thiel M (2008) Differential expression of 5'-UTR splice variants of the adenosine A_2A receptor gene in human granulocytes: identification, characterization, and functional impact on activation. FASEB J 22: 3276–3286. pmid:18541693
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[67] View Article

[68] PubMed/NCBI

[69] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Haynes J, Obiako B, Thompson WJ, Downey J (1995) Adenosine-induced vasodilation: receptor characterization in pulmonary circulation. American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology 268: H1862–H1868.
View Article
Google Scholar

[71] View Article

[72] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Nolan T, Hands RE, Bustin SA (2006) Quantification of mRNA using real-time RT-PCR. Nat Protocols 1: 1559–1582. pmid:17406449
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Cowley AW Jr. (2006) The genetic dissection of essential hypertension. Nature Reviews Genetics 7: 829(812). pmid:17033627
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Okamoto K, Tabei R, Fukushima M, Nosaka S, Yamori Y (1966) Further observations of the development of a strain of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Jpn Circ J 30: 703–716. pmid:6012808
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Sofola OA, Knill A, Hainsworth R, Drinkhill M (2002) Change in endothelial function in mesenteric arteries of sprague-dawley rats fed a high salt diet. The Journal of Physiology 543: 255–260. pmid:12181296
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] PubMed/NCBI

[88] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Badyal DK, Dadhich A P, Lata H (2003) Animal models of hypertension and effect of drugs. Indian Journal of pharmacology 35 349–362.
View Article
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Martin TC, Bhaskar YG, Umesh KV (2008) Clinical determinants of increased left ventricular mass on echocardiogram in medically treated Afro-Caribbean hypertensive patients. West Indian Med J 57: 337–341. pmid:19566012
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] PubMed/NCBI

[95] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Kokubo M, Uemura A, Matsubara T, Murohara T (2005) Noninvasive evaluation of the time course of change in cardiac function in spontaneously hypertensive rats by echocardiography. Hypertens Res 28: 601–609. pmid:16335889
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[97] View Article

[98] PubMed/NCBI

[99] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Wallen WJ, Cserti C, Belanger MP, Wittnich C (2000) Gender-differences in myocardial adaptation to afterload in normotensive and hypertensive rats. Hypertension 36: 774–779. pmid:11082142
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[101] View Article

[102] PubMed/NCBI

[103] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Clubb FJ Jr., Bell PD, Kriseman JD, Bishop SP (1987) Myocardial cell growth and blood pressure development in neonatal spontaneously hypertensive rats. Lab Invest 56: 189–197. pmid:3807318
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[105] View Article

[106] PubMed/NCBI

[107] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Intengan HD, Schiffrin EL (2001) Vascular Remodeling in Hypertension: Roles of Apoptosis, Inflammation, and Fibrosis. Hypertension 38: 581–587. pmid:11566935
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[109] View Article

[110] PubMed/NCBI

[111] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Autelitano DJ, van den Buuse M (1995) Altered expression of dopamine D₂ receptor rnRNA splice variants in brain and pituitary of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Neuroscience Letters 195: 1–4. pmid:7478242
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[113] View Article

[114] PubMed/NCBI

[115] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Lerman LO, Chade AR, Sica V, Napoli C (2005) Animal models of hypertension: An overview. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 146: 160–173. pmid:16131455
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[117] View Article

[118] PubMed/NCBI

[119] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Nishat S, Shabir H, Azmi AS, Ansari HR (2012) A(3) adenosine receptor: a plausible therapeutic target for cardio-protection in diabetes. Recent Pat Cardiovasc Drug Discov 7: 59–70. pmid:22300387
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[121] View Article

[122] PubMed/NCBI

[123] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Auchampach JA, Ge Z-D, Wan TC, Moore J, Gross GJ (2003) The A(3) Adenosine Receptor Agonist IB-MECA Reduces Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in Dogs. American journal of physiology Heart and circulatory physiology 285:
View Article
Google Scholar

[125] View Article

[126] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Carruthers AM, Fozard JR (1993) Hypotensive responses to the putative adenosine A₃ receptor agonist N6-2-(4-aminophenyl)-ethyladenosine in the rat. Drug Development Research 30: 147–152.
View Article
Google Scholar

[128] View Article

[129] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Zhou QY, Li C, Olah ME, Johnson RA, Stiles GL, et al. (1992) Molecular cloning and characterization of an adenosine receptor: the A₃ adenosine receptor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 89: 7432–7436. pmid:1323836
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[131] View Article

[132] PubMed/NCBI

[133] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Tapparelli C, Metternich R, Ehrhardt C, Cook NS (1993) Synthetic low-molecular weight thrombin inhibitors: molecular design and pharmacological profile. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 14: 366–376. pmid:8296393
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] PubMed/NCBI

[137] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Dobson JG, Shea LG, Fenton RA (2008) Adenosine A_2A and β-adrenergic calcium transient and contractile responses in rat ventricular myocytes. American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology 295: H2364–H2372. pmid:18849328
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[139] View Article

[140] PubMed/NCBI

[141] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Liang BT, Haltiwanger B (1995) Adenosine A_2a and A_2b Receptors in Cultured Fetal Chick Heart Cells: High- and Low-Affinity Coupling to Stimulation of Myocyte Contractility and cAMP Accumulation. Circulation Research 76: 242–251. pmid:7834835
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[143] View Article

[144] PubMed/NCBI

[145] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Willems L, Headrick J (2007) Contractile effects of adenosine, coronary flow and perfusion pressure in murine myocardium. Pflügers Archiv—European Journal of Physiology 453: 433–441. pmid:17072640
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[147] View Article

[148] PubMed/NCBI

[149] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Dankelman J, Stassen HG, Spaan JAE (1999) Interaction between Gregg's phenomenon and coronary flow control: a model study. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 37: 742–749.
View Article
Google Scholar

[151] View Article

[152] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Chandrasekera PC, McIntosh VJ, Cao FX, Lasley RD (2010) Differential effects of adenosine A_2a and A_2b receptors on cardiac contractility. American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology 299: H2082–H2089. pmid:20935155
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[154] View Article

[155] PubMed/NCBI

[156] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Introduction

Methods and Materials

Ethics statement

Conscious rat systolic blood pressure

Sample preparation of animal tissues

RNA extraction

Real time PCR

Langendorff isolated heart preparation

Measurements of parameters and statistical analysis

Results

The expression of adenosine A3 receptor was associated with essential hypertension in a tissue specific fashion

Baseline measurements of rats and isolated hearts

Effects of APNEA, CL-IB-MECA and 8SPT on coronary vasodilation in isolated hearts

Discussion

Supporting Information

S1 Appendix. Reference gene stability, PCR amplification efficiency analysis and Primer sequences.

Author Contributions

References

The expression of adenosine A₃ receptor was associated with essential hypertension in a tissue specific fashion