Gloss Evaluation of Hairline-Finished Metal Surface Using Patterned Area Illumination Method: Relationship between Gloss Evaluation and Surface Roughness for the Estimation of Surface Roughness

Tadanori Sugino; Yuki Tashiro; Yasuo Yamane

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.749.251

Paper Titles

Epitaxial Growth of Diamond by In-Liquid Plasma CVD Method
p.211

Synthesis of Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes by In-Liquid CVD
p.217

Prediction of Static and Dynamic Mechanical Properties of GFRTP Product through Injection Molding
p.223

Experimental Analysis on Surface Profile of Sapphire Wafer after Polishing by Chemical Mechanical Polishing
p.229

Modeling Strength and Stress Diffusion in Hip Prostheses with Nano-Reinforced Composites
p.234

Applicability of Interrupted Micro Cutting Process “Tilling” as Surface Texturing
p.241

Effects of Machining History on Tribological Properties of Bronze Containing Micro-Sized Sulfide
p.246

Gloss Evaluation of Hairline-Finished Metal Surface Using Patterned Area Illumination Method: Relationship between Gloss Evaluation and Surface Roughness for the Estimation of Surface Roughness
p.251

Stress Analysis for a Substrate Holder Module and Thin Films Grown in an MOCVD Reactor
p.257

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 749Gloss Evaluation of Hairline-Finished Metal...

Gloss Evaluation of Hairline-Finished Metal Surface Using Patterned Area Illumination Method: Relationship between Gloss Evaluation and Surface Roughness for the Estimation of Surface Roughness

Abstract:

The gloss of a metal surface is an important aspect for product quality evaluation. In general, gloss is influenced by specular reflection of light on a metal surface. Therefore, evaluating the specular reflection is almost the same as evaluating the gloss. We propose a method that uses patterned area illumination to evaluate specular reflection. In specular reflection, the angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection. Consequently, when light (ray) of the area illumination, which has a striped pattern, are projected on a glossy metal surface, a striped pattern forms on the reflected image as a mirror-like reflection, and the sharpness of the striped pattern of the image provides information about the specular reflection on the surface. This characteristic is applied to a metal with a hairline surface finish. A hairline surface presents different glossiness at different viewpoints. When the direction of the striped pattern of illumination is changed, the sharpness of striped pattern on the reflected image varies owing to the surface roughness of the hairline finish. Therefore, we can evaluate the glossiness in various directions by rotating the pattern. The rough relationships between gloss evaluation value and surface roughness were indicated in our study. In order to make the relationship between gloss evaluation and surface roughness for the estimation of surface roughness, we had tried the comparison for the gloss evaluation value and the surface roughness. The more precise relationship for seven directions on hairline-finished metal surface was measured. This report describes the results and considers the possibility of estimation of surface roughness by the gloss evaluation value.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Recent Development in Machining, Materials and Mechanical Technologies II

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 749)

Pages:

251-256

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.749.251

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

August 2017

Authors:

Tadanori Sugino*, Yuki Tashiro, Yasuo Yamane

Keywords:

Area Illumination, Gloss Evaluation, Hairline, Image Processing, Striped Pattern, Surface Roughness

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] JIS Z8741: Japanese Industrial Standards, (1983) (in Japanese).

Google Scholar

[2] N. Araki, Y. Konishi, H. Ishigaki, A Specular Rate Evaluation Method for Metal Surface Using a Pattern Reflected Image, Journal of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering, Vol. 72, No. 3, (2006) pp.366-371 (in Japanese).

DOI: 10.2493/jspe.72.366

Google Scholar

[3] T. Sugino, Y. Satozono, Y. Yamane, Gloss Evaluation Method for Metal Surface with Hairline Using Patterned Area Illumination, Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 407-408, (2009) pp.723-726.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.407-408.723

Google Scholar

[4] T. Sugino, Y. Yamane, Gloss Evaluation of Hairline-finished Metal Surface Using Patterned Area Illumination Method: Pattern Size and Surface Roughness, Proc. of the Tenth International Conference on Progress of Machining Technology, (2012).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.749.251

Google Scholar

[5] A. Zawada-Tomkiewicz, Estimation of Surface Roughness Parameter Based on Machined Surface Image, Metrology and Measurement Systems, Vol. XVII, No. 3, (2010), pp.493-504.

DOI: 10.2478/v10178-010-0041-5

Google Scholar

[6] T. Sugino, Y. Yamane, Gloss Evaluation of Hairline-finished Metal Surface Using Patterned Area Illumination Method: Reproduction of Gloss Evaluation by Ray Tracing, Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 656-657, (2014) pp.468-472.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.656-657.468

Google Scholar